Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
Since it is traditional for nominees to not comment on issues that they might be asked to rule on, I find it strange for you to think that they were asked about such an issue, and that they responded.
I am sure that if I were nominated and asked a questions on a similar issue, I would prefer to be on the Court rather than sitting on the sidelines while others make decisions adverse to what I would make. I would lie. I can deal with the fall out.Life is complex.Comment
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
I remember reading an ethics treatise on why the truth is important. The subject was covered very well indeed, and the conclusion was a stunner. To paraphrase: "If you are known as a truthful person, when the day comes that you have to tell a lie you will be believed."There is nothing quite as permanent as a good temporary repair.Comment
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
That and he wasn't about to leave Marlene Dietrich, they had it going on...Comment
-
You frequently post that the Supreme Court justices appointed by Trump lied during their confirmation hearings. This is not true. If you know it’s not true, YOU are lying. If you believe it’s true you are misinformed. The fact is that none of them made any statements about how they would vote on any cases that could come before the court in the future. They all affirmed that they recognized Rowe v. Wade as established precedent BEFORE a case challenging it came before them.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
"Banning books in spite of the 1st amendment, but refusing to regulate guns in spite of "well regulated militia' being in the 2nd amendment makes no sense. Can't think of anyone ever shot by a book
Comment
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
I find that unacceptable. I find a politician who votes against a bill taking credit for the money it brings to his state/district also unacceptable.
How can a democracy function if deliberately misinforming voters is acceptable?"Banning books in spite of the 1st amendment, but refusing to regulate guns in spite of "well regulated militia' being in the 2nd amendment makes no sense. Can't think of anyone ever shot by a book
Comment
-
"Banning books in spite of the 1st amendment, but refusing to regulate guns in spite of "well regulated militia' being in the 2nd amendment makes no sense. Can't think of anyone ever shot by a book
Comment
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
Guess there's some truth to that. I remember, proudly, overhearing my Postmaster yell at his supervisors. The line that stood out was, "Smith (me) at least never lied to me." I assume his supervisors had."Banning books in spite of the 1st amendment, but refusing to regulate guns in spite of "well regulated militia' being in the 2nd amendment makes no sense. Can't think of anyone ever shot by a book
Comment
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
You frequently post that the Supreme Court justices appointed by Trump lied during their confirmation hearings. This is not true. If you know it’s not true, YOU are lying. If you believe it’s true you are misinformed. The fact is that none of them made any statements about how they would vote on any cases that could come before the court in the future. They all affirmed that they recognized Rowe v. Wade as established precedent BEFORE a case challenging it came before them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk"Banning books in spite of the 1st amendment, but refusing to regulate guns in spite of "well regulated militia' being in the 2nd amendment makes no sense. Can't think of anyone ever shot by a book
Comment
-
Comment
-
"Banning books in spite of the 1st amendment, but refusing to regulate guns in spite of "well regulated militia' being in the 2nd amendment makes no sense. Can't think of anyone ever shot by a book
Comment
-
Re: I almost hate to ask this, but when does lying cross the line?
John Wayne's real name was Marion and he wore lifts in his boots. He also ran around happily denouncing people as communists and ruining their careers. What a creep. Not sure why people like him. The man was an actor, he played a man's man in film, doesn't mean he was one.
Comment
Comment