I don't think 'stupid' is the word. My brother and my aunt, both now deceased, watched FOX. They believed they were getting actual news and considered themselves well informed.
Anyone who watches a 'NEWS' network is entitled to believe they're getting actual facts as news. My aunt was quite angry that California's farmers needed the scarce water (long drought), but the DOI under Obama was sending that scarce water to the wetlands where the smelts lived.
She INSISTED I watch a Hannity live special on this so I'd know what was going on. Hannity spent an hour on the DOI sending the scarce water to the smelts, when the farmers needed it. It took some time the following day, but I found the DOI had been sending that water to the farmers in the valley for at least a month before this live special. The entire hour was a lie.
Exactly how is the FOX view supposed to know they're being lied to? How many FOX viewers know about the $700 plus FoX must pay Dominion?
It is truly important to understand that during Watergate we had fewer news outlets, and ALL of them reported the same set of facts. Everyone at work, regardless of what they'd like to think, for example, KNEW 18 minutes of tape had been erased. Republicans on the committee asked tough questions; seeking the truth rather than protecting Nixon.
I've often voiced the opinion, with far less support than I'd expect or like, that a 'news' network lying is fraud and should be treated as such. Reporting falsehoods as facts under 'news', to my mind, is fraud and should be treated as such. Thanks to Dominion's suit, those who don't watch FOX, Newsmax, and such, KNOW the people on FOX were reporting stuff they knew was not true.
So, where is the line between free speech and fraud?
Comment