Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    SF Bay Area- Richmond
    Posts
    12,324

    Default Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurney_flap

    Is water just too dense for this sort of thing to work well enough to be worth doing?

    I know that some designers use a flat plate on the bottom of shallow rudders, but this design element calls for the small flat plate to be on the trailing/rear edge of foils.

    No practical application in mind, just wondering...
    Last edited by Thorne; 12-19-2007 at 10:36 PM.
    "The enemies of reason have a certain blind look."
    Doctor Jacquin to Lieutenant D'Hubert, in Ridley Scott's first major film _The Duellists_.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    9,053

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorne View Post
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurney_flap

    Is water just too dense for this sort of thing to work well enough to be worth doing?

    I know that some designers use a flat plate on the bottom of shallow rudders, but this design element calls for the small flat plate to be on the trailing/read edge of foils.

    No practical application in mind, just wondering...
    Ought to work in water. The only thing that should change is the scale of the "fence" in the design to account for the difference inf fluid density and Reynold's number.

    In college we did lots of fluid research (Air and water, mosty, beer too, but that was after hours...)

    One of the big things we were working on was wake and drag reduction. Take a look and see if you can find information on "Rippled Trailing Edges" - basically they mix the down-stream wake out in both air and water.

    Another thing we worked on was avoiding flow separation to get rid of stall and flow instability on control surfaces of submarines. One way this was done was with a slot on the "pressure" side of the foil parallel to the main axis of the foil. The slot was located at the point where the flow would turn turbulent. The flow from the slot was redirected with angled tubes to the "lee" side of the foil to prevent the flow from separating. Two benefits - one was the delay of the angle of attack where stall would happen, the other was the drag reduction from stripping turbulent flow.

    In jet engines an annular "ring" at the aft end that has this rippled profile is being used in combination with a jet ejector to reduce drag and noise levels on older aircraft (727/737), increase thrust, and by using the jet ejector to mix in lower temperature air with the exhaust it reduces thermal signature of the exhaust. (Important if you want to avoid a heat-seeking missile, for example...)

    Fun stuff to work on.
    "The bottom of a canoe should only touch two things - one is air and the other is water."

    -The Silver Fox

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    45,822

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    I think the chief contribution of the 'gurney flap' was that it allowed the amount of rear down-force to be easily tuned. It would have been greatly time consuming to change the angle of attack of the rear wing during a pit stop, however it only takes about 3 seconds or so to change the flap. Incidentally, Bobby Unser claims he was the inventor of the flap, not Dan Gurney. Bobby and Roger Penske call them wickerbills. They are still used today.
    Mother, should I trust the government. . .

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    West Boothbay Harbor, Maine
    Posts
    20,379

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    Speeds are probably too low, mechanical device to allow for changing tacks too expensive for someone to experiment with, too difficult to prove it makes a difference (and is thus worthwhile) since conditions between one boat and another have too many variables.

    Maybe AC guys would give it a whirl if it fit the rule....
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    9,053

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    Quote Originally Posted by rbgarr View Post
    Speeds are probably too low, mechanical device to allow for changing tacks too expensive for someone to experiment with, too difficult to prove it makes a difference (and is thus worthwhile) since conditions between one boat and another have too many variables.

    Maybe AC guys would give it a whirl if it fit the rule....
    The speed of a boat in air would probably be too low, in water, the change in density could be worth it. Kind of testing that takes flow visualization and pitostatic pressure measurements.

    In the whole scheme of things, you might only be looking at a single digit percentage improvement in angle of attack for the foil. For car racers trying to squeeze out the last ounce of efficiency, yeah. For a boat, you may induce more drag than it's worth with the fence. Anyway, it's not going to make the boat point higher, but just turn a bit faster. You cannot forget that it's a system and you've got hull shape, foils in the water and sails to contend with. The fence will not be a marked improvement. Better off to clean the crud off the bottom.

    On the mechanism to move the fence for tacks? That would be fussy and would have to be strong to deal with the forces involved. One more thing to break...
    Last edited by Canoez; 12-20-2007 at 07:19 AM. Reason: In the whole scheme of things...
    "The bottom of a canoe should only touch two things - one is air and the other is water."

    -The Silver Fox

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hampstead NC
    Posts
    371

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    I have seen a V shape on the back of work boat rudders

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    West Boothbay Harbor, Maine
    Posts
    20,379

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    Those rudders help redirect the prop thrust for a tighter turning radius.
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Duncan, Vancouver Island
    Posts
    23,303

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    Gurney flaps have found their way onto junk sails as well.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norwich,United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,548

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    The wing that the original Gurney flap was fitted to only had to work in one direction.The foils beneath a boat have to work on both tacks.We may be lucky enough to have a forumite with a good understanding of fluid dynamics take an interest in this thread and explain whether this is a factor.FWIW the book written by Gordon Trower on yacht design refers to an improvement in lift for a minor drag penalty if a keel has a slightly fat trailing edge.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Hyannis, MA, USA
    Posts
    28,923

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    In planing boats that even have rudders, it's pointless. In displacement boats it does work, as has been pointed out, but the drag makes it unsuitable for most applications. In sailboats where improved turning power is needed, a bottom foil is a better appendage.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,294

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    In the race car application, wasn't there another factor driving it -- mainly that the foil area is carefully measured, so you can't just go with a bigger foil to get more downforce. So to "cheat" the rule, they came up with the flap.

    Courageous did have that trim tab, perhaps a more efficient way to acheive the same goal?


  12. #12

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    Mike Golding's new Open 60 Ecover 3 - not wood though, all carbon - has one of these flaps at her transom which moves vertically a few centimetres unlike the Farr designed Open 60s which have a heavy flap that can be angled down like a motor boat trim tab.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    central wisconsin
    Posts
    1,010

    Default Re: Why no "Gurney Flap" for boat foils?

    as i understand a gurney flap, it is a device that actually tricks the airflow into acting as it would passing over a wider wing with a thicker chord. assuming the same phenomena on a sailboat's foil, what would happen to the dynamics of the sail's center of effort and foil's center of lateral resistance?

Similar Threads

  1. "S" Boat racing and "P" Class beauty
    By Joe ( Cold Spring on Hudson ) in forum Misc. Boat Related
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-07-2007, 06:53 AM
  2. Swampscott dory by "Essex Built Boat Lovers Boat Shop"
    By Steve Paskey in forum People & Places
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2006, 07:03 AM
  3. Locate Texas Builder of Reuel Parker's "Presto"-- "Exuma 36"
    By John E Hardiman in forum Designs / Plans
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-01-2004, 01:09 AM
  4. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 12-15-2003, 09:10 AM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-02-2002, 12:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •