Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Galvanic series - bronze and silver solder?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dooral Dooral, Eastern Oz
    Posts
    40,207

    Default Galvanic series - bronze and silver solder?

    I've got an issue with the plumbing for the head on Grantala.

    I brought in some 90 degree bronze fittings which weren't what was depicted in the online catalogue - ie they were supposed to take two sizes of hose, but turned up as a single size fitting. At least that supplier has amended their catalogue as a result - but, I still have the problem of a couple of skin fittings that need 90 degree elbows that reduce from 1.25 and 1.5 inch pipes down to 1 inch hose. Oh - and I refuse to have plastic fittings on any circuit that will be left open for any length of time.

    So - I need to make my own bronze fittings up - from the supplied fittings and some 1" hose tails. The larger, 1.5" fitting looks large enough to just tap for the hose fitting, but the 1.25" fitting will need to be either brazed or as someone else suggested, silver-soldered. My welding supply shop couldn't help with bronze brazing rods and I'm a bit concerned about galvanic issues with the silver solder. Silver and lead are both a bit more noble than bronze - but it doesn't appear to be too far apart.

    Do we have any galvanic series experts here who could add to the discussion? Calder, incidentally, hasn't got silver solder in the table in his book, but I did find it mentioned online elsewhere - at about the Monel level.

    Thanks
    Ian
    Carpe the living sh!t out of the Diem


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    D'Entrecasteaux Channel
    Posts
    1,598

    Default

    Why not braze it with some MAPP?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cape Fear, NC, USA
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    http://www.csudh.edu/oliver/chemdata/alloys.htm

    80Ag, 13Cu, 6.8Zn Silver solder, hard


    *****************************************


    http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Def...nic-series.htm

    Active (Anodic)

    1. Magnesium
    2. Mg alloy AZ-31B
    3. Mg alloy HK-31A
    4. Zinc (hot-dip, die cast, or plated)
    5. Beryllium (hot pressed)
    6. Al 7072 clad on 7075
    7. Al 2014-T3
    8. Al 1160-H14
    9. Al 7079-T6
    10. Cadmium (plated)
    11. Uranium
    12. Al 218 (die cast)
    13. Al 5052-0
    14. Al 5052-H12
    15. Al 5456-0, H353
    16. Al 5052-H32
    17. Al 1100-0
    18. Al 3003-H25
    19. Al 6061-T6
    20. Al A360 (die cast)
    21. Al 7075-T6
    22. Al 6061-0
    23. Indium
    24. Al 2014-0
    25. Al 2024-T4
    26. Al 5052-H16
    27. Tin (plated)
    28. Stainless steel 430 (active)
    29. Lead
    30. Steel 1010
    31. Iron (cast)
    32. Stainless steel 410 (active)
    33. Copper (plated, cast, or wrought)
    34. Nickel (plated)
    35. Chromium (Plated)
    36. Tantalum
    37. AM350 (active)
    38. Stainless steel 310 (active)
    39. Stainless steel 301 (active)
    40. Stainless steel 304 (active)
    41. Stainless steel 430 (active)
    42. Stainless steel 410 (active)
    43. Stainless steel 17-7PH (active)
    44. Tungsten
    45. Niobium (columbium) 1% Zr
    46. Brass, Yellow, 268
    47. Uranium 8% Mo
    48. Brass, Naval, 464
    49. Yellow Brass
    50. Muntz Metal 280
    51. Brass (plated)
    52. Nickel-silver (18% Ni)
    53. Stainless steel 316L (active)
    54. Bronze 220
    55. Copper 110
    56. Red Brass
    57. Stainless steel 347 (active)
    58. Molybdenum, Commercial pure
    59. Copper-nickel 715
    60. Admiralty brass
    61. Stainless steel 202 (active)
    62. Bronze, Phosphor 534 (B-1)
    63. Monel 400
    64. Stainless steel 201 (active)
    65. Carpenter 20 (active)
    66. Stainless steel 321 (active)
    67. Stainless steel 316 (active)
    68. Stainless steel 309 (active)
    69. Stainless steel 17-7PH (passive)
    70. Silicone Bronze 655
    71. Stainless steel 304 (passive)
    72. Stainless steel 301 (passive)
    73. Stainless steel 321 (passive)
    74. Stainless steel 201 (passive)
    75. Stainless steel 286 (passive)
    76. Stainless steel 316L (passive)
    77. AM355 (active)
    78. Stainless steel 202 (passive)
    79. Carpenter 20 (passive)
    80. AM355 (passive)
    81. A286 (passive)
    82. Titanium 5A1, 2.5 Sn
    83. Titanium 13V, 11Cr, 3Al (annealed)
    84. Titanium 6Al, 4V (solution treated and aged)
    85. Titanium 6Al, 4V (anneal)
    86. Titanium 8Mn
    87. Titanium 13V, 11Cr 3Al (solution heat treated and aged)
    88. Titanium 75A
    89. AM350 (passive)
    90. Silver
    91. Gold
    92. Graphite

    End - Noble (Less Active, Cathodic)
    Last edited by George Ray; 06-24-2007 at 11:22 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dooral Dooral, Eastern Oz
    Posts
    40,207

    Default

    Paul - the issue isn't the gas - I have oxy acetylene at home, rather a concern about a joint failure due to corrosion.

    George - that's interesting, as they don't list silver solder as such in that list. This lot do - and its much lower than straight silver:

    MAGNESIUM
    MAGNESIUM ALLOYS
    ZINC
    ALUMINUM 5052, 3004, 3003, 1100, 6053
    CADMIUM
    ALUMINUM 2117, 2017, 2024
    MILD STEEL (1018), WROUGHT IRON
    CAST IRON, LOW ALLOY HIGH STRENGTH STEEL
    CHROME IRON (ACTIVE)
    STAINLESS STEEL, 430 SERIES (ACTIVE)
    302, 303, 321, 347, 410,416, STAINLESS STEEL (ACTIVE)
    NI - RESIST
    316, 317, STAINLESS STEEL (ACTIVE)
    CARPENTER 20CB-3 STAINLESS (ACTIVE)
    ALUMINUM BRONZE (CA 687)
    HASTELLOY C (ACTIVE) INCONEL 625 (ACTIVE),
    TITANIUM (ACTIVE)
    LEAD - TIN SOLDERS
    LEAD
    TIN
    INCONEL 600 (ACTIVE)
    NICKEL (ACTIVE)
    60 NI-15 CR (ACTIVE)
    80 NI-20 CR (ACTIVE)
    HASTELLOY B (ACTIVE)
    BRASSES
    COPPER (CA102)

    MANGANESE BRONZE (CA 675), TIN BRONZE (CA903, 905)
    SILICONE BRONZE
    NICKEL SILVER
    COPPER - NICKEL ALLOY 90-10
    COPPER - NICKEL ALLOY 80-20
    430 STAINLESS STEEL
    NICKEL, ALUMINUM, BRONZE (CA 630, 632)
    MONEL 400, K500
    SILVER SOLDER
    NICKEL (PASSIVE)
    60 NI- 15 CR (PASSIVE)
    INCONEL 600 (PASSIVE)
    80 NI- 20 CR (PASSIVE)
    CHROME IRON (PASSIVE)
    302, 303, 304, 321, 347, STAINLESS STEEL (PASSIVE)
    316, 317, STAINLESS STEEL (PASSIVE)
    CARPENTER 20 CB-3 STAINLESS (PASSIVE),
    INCOLOY 825NICKEL - MOLYBDEUM - CHROMIUM -
    IRON ALLOY (PASSIVE)
    SILVER
    TITANIUM (PASS.) HASTELLOY C & C276 (PASSIVE),
    INCONEL 625(PASS.)
    GRAPHITE
    ZIRCONIUM
    GOLD
    PLATINUM



    From http://www.prevco.com/Reference/Galvanic.htm

    That said, I'm told to use a specific "Blue tip" Silver solder, not that "plumber's junk". I also just noticed there's a "Nickel Silver" in there that is pretty close to bronze.

    Oh, wouldn't it be nice if the damned fitting had been what it was supposed to have been!
    Carpe the living sh!t out of the Diem


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Guerneville,CA
    Posts
    4,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bigfella View Post
    I've got an issue with the plumbing for the head on Grantala.

    I brought in some 90 degree bronze fittings which weren't what was depicted in the online catalogue - ie they were supposed to take two sizes of hose, but turned up as a single size fitting. At least that supplier has amended their catalogue as a result - but, I still have the problem of a couple of skin fittings that need 90 degree elbows that reduce from 1.25 and 1.5 inch pipes down to 1 inch hose. Oh - and I refuse to have plastic fittings on any circuit that will be left open for any length of time.

    So - I need to make my own bronze fittings up - from the supplied fittings and some 1" hose tails. The larger, 1.5" fitting looks large enough to just tap for the hose fitting, but the 1.25" fitting will need to be either brazed or as someone else suggested, silver-soldered. My welding supply shop couldn't help with bronze brazing rods and I'm a bit concerned about galvanic issues with the silver solder. Silver and lead are both a bit more noble than bronze - but it doesn't appear to be too far apart.

    Do we have any galvanic series experts here who could add to the discussion? Calder, incidentally, hasn't got silver solder in the table in his book, but I did find it mentioned online elsewhere - at about the Monel level.

    Thanks
    Ian
    One solution would be to weld with silicon bronze filler wire - TIG process. I would not braze that part.
    Those that fall behind will be left behind! Arghhhh

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    FL. USA
    Posts
    6,103

    Default

    Surely, there has to be another way to adapt it without welding. We come across this different size hose issue alot when setting up livewells/baitwells in alot of the boats we work on.

    It would be better if they would just standardize the stuff to begin with.
    Last edited by pipefitter; 06-25-2007 at 02:16 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dooral Dooral, Eastern Oz
    Posts
    40,207

    Default

    Surely, there has to be another way to adapt it without welding. We come across this different size hose issue alot when setting up livewells/baitwells in alot of the boats we work on.

    It would be better if they would just standardize the stuff to begin with.
    I totally agree with you there, but this is an old boat and I've got to deal with a couple of oversized through-hulls here. I may get around to replacing that plank some year - athough, I think these are on different planks ........

    I have got it connected up - but with plastic fittings - and I hate them with a vengeance.

    Ian
    Carpe the living sh!t out of the Diem


  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chester Basin, NS, Canada
    Posts
    131

    Default

    What I find very curious is that even experts can not agree on the correct sequence. Note Monel 400 and Silicon Bronze (655):
    "63. Monel 400
    64. Stainless steel 201 (active)
    65. Carpenter 20 (active)
    66. Stainless steel 321 (active)
    67. Stainless steel 316 (active)
    68. Stainless steel 309 (active)
    69. Stainless steel 17-7PH (passive)
    70. Silicone Bronze 655" and
    "SILICONE BRONZE
    NICKEL SILVER
    COPPER - NICKEL ALLOY 90-10
    COPPER - NICKEL ALLOY 80-20
    430 STAINLESS STEEL
    NICKEL, ALUMINUM, BRONZE (CA 630, 632)
    MONEL 400, K500".
    What can we normal mortals decide then?
    Is there a definitive list that everyone agrees to?

    John

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dooral Dooral, Eastern Oz
    Posts
    40,207

    Default

    The difference may be due to the testing medium perhaps? ie seawater - or an alternative solution.
    Carpe the living sh!t out of the Diem


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Cape Fear, NC, USA
    Posts
    2,333

    Default

    Is there a definitive list that everyone agrees to?
    Get: (A) bronze from the head, (B) New bronze tailpipe, (C) stick of hard silver solder, (D) Sea Water, (E) Digital Volt Meter.

    Immerse and measure the developed potential between AB, AC, BC.

    Report back.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dooral Dooral, Eastern Oz
    Posts
    40,207

    Default

    Get: (A) bronze from the head, (B) New bronze tailpipe, (C) stick of hard silver solder, (D) Sea Water, (E) Digital Volt Meter.

    Immerse and measure the developed potential between AB, AC, BC.

    Report back.
    It has barely stopped raining here for weeks - my boats in "fresh" rather brown water at the moment - and given that there are a million or so cats and dogs not far upstream, I'm not inclined to taste it to check its salinity at the moment! Good idea though - thanks
    Carpe the living sh!t out of the Diem


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Port Townsend WA
    Posts
    6,678

    Default

    All I can say is that I have had good luck with, made up, above water fittings that I have silver soldered. How ever, I once fastened a silver coin to a mast heel with a copper sheathing clout nail from "Cutty Sark." After one season, the nail was eaten away! The mast heel was not immersed, just in a damp area.
    Jay

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Guerneville,CA
    Posts
    4,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jverl View Post
    What I find very curious is that even experts can not agree on the correct sequence. Note Monel 400 and Silicon Bronze (655):
    "63. Monel 400
    64. Stainless steel 201 (active)
    65. Carpenter 20 (active)
    66. Stainless steel 321 (active)
    67. Stainless steel 316 (active)
    68. Stainless steel 309 (active)
    69. Stainless steel 17-7PH (passive)
    70. Silicone Bronze 655" and
    "SILICONE BRONZE
    NICKEL SILVER
    COPPER - NICKEL ALLOY 90-10
    COPPER - NICKEL ALLOY 80-20
    430 STAINLESS STEEL
    NICKEL, ALUMINUM, BRONZE (CA 630, 632)
    MONEL 400, K500".
    What can we normal mortals decide then?
    Is there a definitive list that everyone agrees to?
    John
    Stainless (passive) means above the waterline.
    17-PH would be a propshaft . Part of it below the water and part of it above the waterline. A very special case.

    Stainless 321- come on what are the chances? Especially below the water?

    309 stainless. (active) Why would it be used below the water?
    It is used as a filler for joining steel to stainless. Like welding a stainless chain plate to a steel hull.

    The point is that as long as there is not a 30 point difference i would not worry. Keep it as low as possible. But remember if the metal is underwater and moving at 6 knots or more corrosion would be 30% higher.

    Stainless and bronze work ok together and steel and aluminum work together above the water.

    NEVER let a copper penny get in the bilge of a steel boat and dropping a dime could eat its way thru a piece of 3/16 steel in about a year.
    Those that fall behind will be left behind! Arghhhh

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast, Ca
    Posts
    6,764

    Default

    It seems to me that the only galvanic part of the fitting that would be exposed to electrolyte is the very thin edge of the solder joint.
    If that is true any corrosion or electrolysis should be very local i.e. at the .003” or .004" solder lines and of little concern.
    The old “Gold Platers” had much bigger problems, Eh?
    Or - I wouldn’t worry about it.

Similar Threads

  1. silicon bronze screws aging part deux
    By Thad Van Gilder in forum Building / Repair
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-16-2006, 03:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •