Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Ruben's Nymph

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    51

    Post

    Has anyone built "Dynamite" Payson's Ruben's Nymph. It's a little wider than the Nymph and I was wondering if the additional size would make it usable by an average size adult? How was it overall in building and handling? Thanks for any info.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Patuxent River, Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    376

    Post

    Have you checked with the Bolger Discussion Group
    Or Dynamite Payson's Message Board ?

    I'd be interested in what you learn. Eventually, I want to build a tender for our sailboat, and it will have to be able to handle 500 pounds of my family & me. And that seems to be pushing the limits of many of the tenders I look at.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Acworth, GA
    Posts
    4,625

    Post

    Everybody I know who had built a Nymph says it's tender but it rows well. Everyone I know who's built a Reubens Nymph says it's a better boat, especially if you want to sail it. The Reubens version is just a Nymph with a 12" plug added down the centerline. It seems to me if someone felt the orginal was too narrow and Reubens was too wide, it would be very easy to get a compromise by putting only 6-8" additional beam in the Nymph.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    St. Paul, MN, USA
    Posts
    33,445

    Post

    I built one as a tender for a larger sailboat a few years ago. The additional width is a great improvement. It will carry three or four large adults in reasonably calm water with no problem. It feels VERY stable with just me, and I'm large and not very coordinated (I did manage to dump it once by a really boneheaded attempt at boarding off a high dock, but that's another story). It rows easily, although not fast, and tows very well. No problems building; standard taped-seam with lots of nasty goop. I used 3/4 plywood (instead of 1/4) for the transoms and frames, and reduced the frames' cross-section to something approaching a standard sawn frame - only a slight increase in weight, and it was a LOT easier to set up the hull becuse you can screw into the edges of the frames. I also added a normal thwart aft, shortening the centerline seat by about two feet to compensate. I built her for rowing only, so I can't speak to her sailing qualities. Good boat, IMHO.

    [ 12-06-2002, 04:22 PM: Message edited by: Keith Wilson ]

    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations,
    for nature cannot be fooled."

    Richard Feynman

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •