Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Gotta take the bad with the good

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Irmo, sc
    Posts
    4,559

    Post

    Homosexual couples getting divorced and fighting over custody of the cats. (The professor got 'em, but had to give his "ex" pictures and veternary updates and I guess report cards.)

    Heterosexual couples have enjoyed this bliss for years - I guess if it's good enough for them it outta be good enough for everybody who decides to tie the knot "'til death do us part or I just don't like you anymore".

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/10/ga....ap/index.html

    [ 12-13-2004, 08:27 AM: Message edited by: km gresham ]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    mid america
    Posts
    209

    Post

    "Heterosexual couples have enjoy this bliss for years"

    That's enjoyed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Irmo, sc
    Posts
    4,559

    Post

    Thank you - I hate when that happens, don't you? [img]smile.gif[/img]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Irmo, sc
    Posts
    4,559

    Post

    I figured the people who would be the happiest about homosexuals getting married would be the divorce lawyers! [img]smile.gif[/img]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    41,942

    Post

    Karen, I take it you are an advocate for homosexual unions with the same legal ramifications as heterosexual unions?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    41,942

    Post

    ps. having some passing experience with divorce and lawyers I don't think you'll find smiley faces in court or on a lawyers door as a distraught client comes in the door. Doubly so when custody conflicts arise. You must know a heterosexual couple or two that have experienced divorce.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Irmo, sc
    Posts
    4,559

    Post

    Lots of them. Most of them divorced because they didn't bother to be nice to each other anymore - nothing more profound than that.

    And yes, if homosexuals can wed then they certainly should get to access the divorce courts just as heterosexual couples do.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    28,548

    Post

    Highest divorce rates are in the Red States regardless of homosexuality

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Hyannis, MA, USA
    Posts
    42,773

    Post

    Civil wedding simplifies and regularizes property arrangements. By the same token, divorce regularizes the dissolution of such arrangements.

    Both are preferable to the unregulated messiness that accompanies unwedded couples arranging everything from health care decisions to home ownership and perhaps later seperating.

    Which is why any couple should have the free choise in this matter. Mary Ellen and I should remain free not to wed so long aas that is our choise and Biff and Bob should be free to wed, if that's their's. And the Roman Catholic Church remains free not to sanction any wedding I might have, not being RC myself, just as it's free not to sanction gay unions, even if both partners are RC.

    Let freedom reign.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    41,942

    Post

    Originally posted by km gresham:
    Lots of them. Most of them divorced because they didn't bother to be nice to each other anymore - nothing more profound than that.

    And yes, if homosexuals can wed then they certainly should get to access the divorce courts just as heterosexual couples do.
    I didn't ask if wedded gays should have the same legal rights,,I asked if you advocated the legal institution that granted the same legal rights.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Broken Arrow, OK US
    Posts
    6,657

    Post

    Ian is very wise.

  12. #12

    Post

    I asked if you advocated the legal institution that granted the same legal rights.
    I am watching to see the answer as well Lee.
    What about it KM Gresham?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Fredericton, New Brunswick
    Posts
    32,066

    Post

    Heck, KM won't answer this one. It's one thing to observe that "equal access for divorce" is good if "equal access to marriage" is necessary. It's quite another thing to support gay/lesbian rights. Despite Cheney's family, it's simly too "liberal" to be stomached.

    For God's sake - what would Anne Coulter say if she found out?

    T.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Irmo, sc
    Posts
    4,559

    Post

    Legal civil unions, not marriage. Same legal rights, privileges, and responsibilities, but not the same contract. I've said this before. I guess y'all forgot. [img]smile.gif[/img]

    I'm for legal civil unions for as many adults as want them in whatever combination(s). Marriage is one man and one woman. Civil union could be 3 men, one woman and one transexual for all I care. Then everybody can do whatever they please. Isn't that really what it's all about anyway. Live and let live and all that stuff.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    10,639

    Post

    They're just bating you, Karen ... let'em go.

    Heck, more divorce in red states ... but BIGGER mouths in blue states ...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    28,548

    Post

    I'm still married to my first wife

  17. #17

    Post

    Marriage is one man and one woman.
    In Canada that's not the case any longer. [img]smile.gif[/img]

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Port of Lorain,Ohio
    Posts
    14,558

    Post

    "There's only one way to have a happy marriage and as soon as I learn what it is I'll get married again."
    Clint Eastwood (1930 - )

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •