Wordle is blowing my mind.
.
I began checking out the official New York Times "Wordle Bot" after each morning's play of the game. The Bot analyses one's play.
Yesterday morning I solved the puzzle in five guesses. My first guess was "RAISE." The Bot analysis: "This is a great opening word. On average this will cut the number of possible solutions to 61." My second guess - "TASER" - surprised the Bot, "I'll have to be honest. I had to look that one up." But that guess reduced the number of correct solutions to two... according to the Bot. My third guess - "ASPEN" was a valid guess and accepted by the game... but was NOT in the game's database of 2,309 solutions! WTF? Nevertheless the Bot said my guess had "narrowed it down to one possible solution." My fourth guess was "ASKED." Puzzle solved? No! Once again a valid choice but "isn't one of 2,309 Wordle solutions." Sheesh.... My fifth choice was the solution: "ASKEW."
My first thought was that this was all a result of the NYT admitted editing of Josh Wardle's original game database to eliminate British word usage and dumb down the game for Americans. But all my guesses are words in common use.
Then this morning I did it once again! I solved the puzzle in 4 guesses. But after my second guess the Bot analysis was: "You've narrowed it down to one possible solution. You should solve the puzzle on the next turn." But my next guess, while accepted as a valid choice, was not among the game's database of solutions. The Bot told me, "Sorry, I don't make the rules." Totally FUBAR. Or maybe I'm too smart to be playing the NYT version game?
Last edited by Tom Montgomery; 04-26-2022 at 08:24 AM.
"They have a lot of stupid people that vote in their primaries. They really do. I'm not really supposed to say that but it's an obvious fact. But when stupid people vote, you know who they nominate? Other stupid people." -- James Carville on the plethora of low-quality GQP candidates in the mid-term election.