On the trailing edge of technology.
https://www.amazon.com/Outlaw-John-L.../dp/B07LC6Y934
http://www.scribd.com/johnmwatkins/documents
http://booksellersvsbestsellers.blogspot.com/
If someone sugested my area should be a buffer zone of some kind, I would not like it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_state
Research shows that buffer states are significantly more likely to be conquered and occupied than are nonbuffer states.[2]
Ragnar B.
Oh I agree with Mizzenman, that's the whole point of a buffer state, to give the next in line time to react .
Following the news about tanks, the German Leopard series and the US Abrams, I learned a few things.
One: the Germans have sold the Leopard tank to quite a few nations and there are a lot of them, with stocks of ammunition, in countries that favor Ukraine.
Two: the basic design of the Leopard tank is rather old and well-proven. The engine is a V-12 diesel, that uses the same fuel as other diesel vehicles.
Three: the US Abrams tank is powered by a turbine. Early versions had such a hot exhaust plume that troops taking shelter behind them got scorched. The present version has a cooler exhaust, but it runs on specialized aviation fuel, with high sulfur content compared to the #2 diesel most often used in heavy vehicles. So Ukraine would have to create a separate supply chain to refuel the Abrams tanks, which consume 2-3 times the gallons per mile of the standard diesel tanks.
https://generalaviationnews.com/2011...s-diesel-fuel/
Evidently, the turbine can be replaced with a conventional diesel engine, but the process would take time.
Maybe you should stick to doing research about Ukraine. Maybe you could help Heimlaga find the pro-putin propagand he keeps talking about but has yet to show. Maybe you could both apply for jobs at Bellingcat and learn how internet analysis is done. It usually starts with gathering information and verifying it before making bold statements. Some one needs to remind Heimlaga that shouting first without any evidence to back up a claim, is not the way to do it. Why you let him carry on making a fool of himself if you are all so friendly, i do not understand. Verbally abusing someone over the internet is not going to get him the confession he wants to hear, and feeding his paranoia is childish to the point of cruelty.
Anyone at any time could have sent me a private message. None of you did. You threw silly names, and insults and accusations first, and expect me to be ok with that and comply. Sorry, through the tears of laughter, this is not how people usually communicate in the world, though there seems to be a lot of it here.
Whatever happened about the "be nice" rule i noticed when i signed up, have you all been here so long you forgot?
NOT about Ukraine.
You have no idea what I might be like when I get grumpy.....
I wrote about DMZ's, not buffer states. Please try to be accurate.
Although the US-Canada DMZ has held pretty well, there was that time in the 1830s when a bunch of USAeans attacked Pelee Island on the Canadian side. They crossed the ice in winter. The redcoats from Fort Malden gave them a good spanking. (It was not really very funny - lives were lost.)
https://windsorstar.com/opinion/patr...f-pelee-island
quite interesting discussion of the M1A2
https://wesodonnell.medium.com/ukrai...s-767fd1458c29
IMAGINES VEL NON FUERINT
The Financial Times is reporting that Lockheed have said that they will be more than happy to re-open their production line to supply new F16s to replace any sent to Ukraine.
The Kingdom of the Netherlands operates 74 F16s
Russia murdered 193 Dutch citizens on Malaysia Airlines flight MH 17 over Ukraine in 2014.
Germany doesn’t operate the F16.
IMAGINES VEL NON FUERINT
On the trailing edge of technology.
https://www.amazon.com/Outlaw-John-L.../dp/B07LC6Y934
http://www.scribd.com/johnmwatkins/documents
http://booksellersvsbestsellers.blogspot.com/
I am, through my father’s mother, a descendant of the most successful US General of the War of 1812.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Brown
I think things have been reasonably quiet since 1815, despite the lack of a buffer state.
IMAGINES VEL NON FUERINT
Ever hear of the Rush-Bagot Treaty ?? Living in Vermont, you should have.
https://history.state.gov/milestones...829/rush-bagot
Sorry for the thread drift, but there have been many proposals for the demilitarization of Central and Eastern Europe.
Rush-Bagot Pact, 1817 and Convention of 1818
So two centuries ago.
Perhaps this is what Sandtown is hankering after?
![]()
It really is quite difficult to build an ugly wooden boat.
The power of the web: Anyone can post anything on the web
The weakness of the web: Anyone can post anything on the web.
DMZ?
Not likely.We've heard the sonic booms from Michigan based fighter planes(Air National Guard?) out for a rip.
Everyone knows that if the US felt like an adventure,we would be overrun in not very many days and if Russia threatened,we would be the battlefield/buffer zone.
R
Sleep with one eye open.
Simpler is better, except when complicated looks really cool.
Skip
---This post is delivered with righteous passion and with a solemn southern directness --
...........fighting against the deliberate polarization of politics...
On the trailing edge of technology.
https://www.amazon.com/Outlaw-John-L.../dp/B07LC6Y934
http://www.scribd.com/johnmwatkins/documents
http://booksellersvsbestsellers.blogspot.com/
fiona hill
On the trailing edge of technology.
https://www.amazon.com/Outlaw-John-L.../dp/B07LC6Y934
http://www.scribd.com/johnmwatkins/documents
http://booksellersvsbestsellers.blogspot.com/
Not close to my favorite, and I did get the cite wrong;
but I was correct in saying the evil Boris J of the UK and theUS blew up the negotiations.
Clearly, Boris - typical UK lap dog PM that he was - would NEVER have done that on his own.
Speaking of negotiations . . .
Ukraine War: Those Who Fail to Call for Negotiations, Fail to Understand the Dangerous Predicament that Faces Our Planet!U.S. Peace Council
January 25, 2023
At no time since the Cuban missile crisis has our world has been so close to disaster. As the war in Ukraine approaches its first anniversary, it is being increasingly transformed by the Biden administration and the “collective west” into a war between NATO and Russia. The danger of turning into a nuclear confrontation is imminent.
The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis was a wake-up call in the midst of Cold War, warning just how close a nuclear World War III could be. Unlike today, both sides sought accommodation. They understood that a retreat from war was in their mutual interest. The Anti-Ballistic Missile and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaties, now scrapped, were negotiated.
Back then, an international peace movement with a robust US contingent amplified the demand for a peaceful world. Such voices are much diminished now. Unlike in the past, not a single Democrat in Congress spoke out for peace, leaving the ideological terrain for war virtually uncontested. Particularly unfortunate are the voices, including some in the U.S. “left,” who continue to beat the drums of war by calling for the continuation of war until the victory of Ukraine. That would only mean the victory of NATO in an all-out war with Russia.
Negotiated peace agreements are not based so much on trust as on the mutual understanding that the alternative is in neither side’s interest. Arguing as some on the “left” do that “Putin’s Russia cannot be trusted,” disregards the fact that no negotiation between warring parties has ever been based on trust.
The undeniable reality facing us should make us all aware of the urgency for negotiations and a diplomatic solution to this war.
The war in and around Ukraine must end. There should be no dispute about that. All wars end either with negotiations or with the victory of one side or the other. Given that this war is not merely between Russia and Ukraine but is between Russia and a Western-backed Ukraine, the first option — for victory — is impossible. Neither Russia (a major nuclear power) nor the Western powers (many of them being major nuclear powers) will tolerate anything near a defeat.
If a military victory is not possible, then the only way forward is for negotiations. War is not an answer. Escalating this war should not be promoted by those who believe in international cooperation and genuine peace. Those who fail to call for negotiations in the midst of this contentious period — with the war ongoing and its impact intensifying a cost-of-living crisis around the world — fail to understand the dangerous predicament that faces the planet.
***
U.S. Peace Council • P.O. Box 3105, New Haven, CT 06515 • (203) 387-0370 • USPC@USPeaceCouncil.org
• https://uspeacecouncil.org • https://www.facebook.com/USPeaceCouncil/ • @USPeaceCouncil
So the thread devolves again to a series of spats, thouroughly diverted by bots and esily distracted others.
Meantime the latest european (proxy) war is ramping up. Most of the potential players are already engaged, apart from boots on the ground. Of course there are 'advisors' and 'trainers', even from Australia, and there'll be a whole lot more as Ukranian crews are trained to a lucky dip of new arms, and those advisors become observers to see how their own pet projects measure up. And if Chinese intelligence isn't thick on the ground as well I'll be very surprised.
Cheers and lots of good fortune to you Heimlaga, I'll be in touch soon.
Last edited by skuthorp; 01-26-2023 at 12:44 AM.
If Russia wanted a "buffer zone" it should have been a bit nicer to those in the zone. NATO hasn't encroached on Russia, the new members of NATO have run away from the Russian bear as fast as they could.