Novalny, Novichock and a FSB hit squad.

[skuthorp]

As suspected, the FSB (Read Putin) is being held responsible for the poisoning of Alexei Navalny, and his wife it seems. The investigators also have the names, photographphs of the alleged 3 man assasination squad, their travel records a mobile phone records.
Of course nothing will come of the investigations into Vlad and his death squads, but then we won't be surprised at that at all will we?
https://news.sky.com/story/alexei-na...-says-12161398

[Flobart]

Bellingcat not exactly a reliable source, judging by who founded and funds them.

[oznabrag]

Bellingcat not exactly a reliable source, judging by who founded and funds them.

So, you get your news from Pravda.

Makes perfect sense.

[Flobart]

So, you get your news from Pravda.

Makes perfect sense.

Not at all. Why are you so quick to jump to conclusions? Anyone who has read the open material on Bellingcat would likely come to a similar conclusion. It is not a news source, more propaganda, much like the Pravda you mentioned.

[oznabrag]

Sounds like sewing up your own wound.


Suture self.

[Flobart]

Sounds like sewing up your own wound.


Suture self.

So how do you value the opinion of someone like Seymour Hersh? Where on your scale does he fall between Putin brown-noser and reliable source of information?

[Peerie Maa]

It seems to me that if the UK Plod can identify and publish their evidence for the two Salisbury assassins, a bunch of investigative journalists can also do the same for Alexei Navalny's assassins.

[oznabrag]

So how do you value the opinion of someone like Seymour Hersh? Where on your scale does he fall between Putin brown-noser and reliable source of information?

First I would have to value the opinion of Flobart, and that ain't happenin'.

[skuthorp]

Hmm, the deniers seem to have expanded their remit……………….

[Flobart]

First I would have to value the opinion of Flobart, and that ain't happenin'.

You did not answer the question regards to Seymour Hersh. This is not about me or my validity, trying to make it so lessens your integrity to be open to new information, argue the point if you will, or dispute it, behaving like DavidG is not a good look or road to be going down.

[Andrew Craig-Bennett]

Bellingcat not exactly a reliable source, judging by who founded and funds them.

Bollocks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingcat

[Flobart]

Bollocks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingcat

Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources. ...

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source - Wikipedia


Bollocks indeed.

[Keith Wilson]

Well, Skaraborgcraft-Flobart are nothing if not predictable. A tip: defending the Russian government's assassination of Mr. Navalny, or trying to cast doubt on it, is clumsy and futile. The evidence is clear, and there is no defense. Whataboutism might work, or at least distract better. Best stop digging, and save your efforts for something more profitable.

[Flobart]

I do not specialize in mental illness, but your behaviour appears to be consistent with borderline personality disorder; I hope i am wrong, but your post is questionable.

Well, Skaraborgcraft-Flobart are nothing if not predictable.

You have a history of making outlandish claims, yet never offer any proof of those claims.

A tip: defending the Russian government's assassination of Mr. Navalny,

Please show evidence i have defended the Russian government. Mr Navalny is alive, as are the Skripals, yet again, you make a false post quoting that they have been "assassinated", so who is trying to cast doubt and be clumsy?

The evidence is clear, and there is no defense

No it is not. What research have you done? What is your opinion on the view of Seymour Hersh and Oleg Kashin? Feel free to question their viewpoint with some substantive counter argument.

. Whataboutism might work, or at least distract better. Best stop digging, and save your efforts for something more profitable

You appear to offer advice you want others to take, but feel you have no responsibility to do likewise; that makes you appear to be a whole lot of things, none of which are good.

It would be better for all concerned if you debated the content and discussion point in question, but again, you have a history of making personal remarks, distractions and false comments, all trollish behaviour, but that seems that is what you revert to when you are unable to articulate a half intelligent response.