You do not check any of the allegations, to determine the veracity of each.
You also do not stop to analyse each allegation, using balanced reasoning seasoned by the spices of context, and they weighed up by a slow cooking of deep contemplation of the philosophies of each alleged act.
Further more you post nothing, and therefore apparently do not care about, any oppositions alleged act, thereby seem content in your immense unscientific bias, leaving us nothing, except the post of someone who thinks he has opinions, but in fact does not, who is merely regurgitating mandated uni-media C+P drivel, but is so content in his surety as to be ridiculous to most thinking men.
You just read this crap, believed it, did not question it, did not think about it, swallowed it as what you should think, posted it here, when it is challenged you didn't understand the challenge and got pissy, as usual.
So please do not expect to be taken seriously, you have played your hand. If you are incapable of deeper thought, well..
...you're just plumbing.
I'm embarrassed for you I even have to explain this, but I have done you a favour if any of this actually gets through, which might justify some of my wasted time I suppose.
Let’s see what the British public believe
Philosophy 101, Chuck. You make an assertion, it's on you to back it up.
Do your homework.
It's all fun and games until Darth Vader comes.
Nah. They've spoken loud and clear on a whole bunch of their perceptions, but the public does not determine veracity.
What are you doing about it?