Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 789 ... LastLast
Results 246 to 280 of 455

Thread: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

  1. #246
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    St. Paul, MN, USA
    Posts
    50,527

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Once again: alternate history is a subclass of fiction. I don't know what would have happened had Bernie Sanders not lost in the primaries (yes, you got it, he lost in the primaries) to Ms. Clinton. Neither does anyone else. Arguing about it might be a way to pass the time, but it will never arrive at an answer

    One reason the Republicans win more elections that demographics would indicate is that once a candidate is picked, often by a pretty fractious process, they generally unite behind him.
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations,
    for nature cannot be fooled."

    Richard Feynman

  2. #247
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    51,096

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    David G
    Harbor Woodworks
    https://www.facebook.com/HarborWoodworks/

    "It was a Sunday morning and Goddard gave thanks that there were still places where one could worship in temples not made by human hands." -- L. F. Herreshoff (The Compleat Cruiser)

  3. #248
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by oznabrag View Post
    People like you have squandered that slim advantage, after having made substantial gains.

    Truly pathetic.
    oz,

    what in the world are you talking about? "People like me?" You're completely and utterly clueless.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  4. #249
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by twodot View Post
    ...nobody is saying that we should willfully offer up a stinker. I am saying that we should try very, very, very hard to put forward a candidate that has the best chance of unifying the Democratic party, and the best chance of beating Trump. We should try hard to bring progressives and independents enthusiastically into the fold. However, if the process somehow fails, because it is democratic and therefore imperfect, then we must hold our noses and vote against Trump.
    I agree with you. But my point is, lots of progressive voters don't, and won't. That point was made when 12% of voters who identify as Democratic or "leaning" Democratic voted for Trump.

    What I am saying on this thread is pure pragmatism. Since we know from experience that 12% of the likely D voters are willing to NOT vote for a D if they don't get a candidate they feel represents them, and Clinton supporters seem to be saying "We must hold our noses and vote for whoever ends up being the candidate"--well, it seems painfully obvious that Democratic voters would do well to pick a candidate who appeals to that 12% this time.

    So my message is not really to the DNC (though it'd be nice if they would be fair). And it's certainly not a message about 2016. It's to voters. To you people. And it's for 2020. If you want that 12% who abandoned the party last time, AND want to add young voters too, the best way to get them is to vote for a progressive candidate in the primary. After all, you'll all hold your noses and vote for any D. So make it a D that young voters and progressives--all of us--will vote for, too.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  5. #250
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by twodot View Post
    Tom,
    The OP was highly polarizing..."Democrats will never get redemption until they admit that Hillary Clinton was a huge mistake and a horrible candidate"...and the comments may appear condescending, belligerent, or pugnacious simply because they match the tone of the OP.
    Tom
    I can see that. But we can step back from that tone and discuss rationally if we choose to. I think there's a good point being made under the heated rhetoric.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  6. #251
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by oznabrag View Post
    The progressives will never recover the power they enjoyed in the 60s/70s by complaining about the DNC.

    We must co-opt the DNC.
    oz,

    do you recognize that this is exactly what I'm saying? It's up to primary voters to support a progressive candidate in the primary. It seems obvious the DNC is going to tend to support an establishment moderate. In so doing, they risk losing the same 12% they did last time. And also won't appeal strongly to young voters. So, do I trust the DNC? No way. But the voters have the real power in the end. It's as simple as voting progressive in the primary.

    Or voting for the "hold your nose" candidate and see Dems lose again.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  7. #252
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    This:
    Quote Originally Posted by WI-Tom View Post
    Before you all start whining about "Berniacs" again, please understand I am making absolutely no argument here about 2016.
    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    Directly contradicts this:
    Quote Originally Posted by WI-Tom View Post
    I am simply pointing out the Sanders clearly was onto something that appeals to young voters. You know, the future of the party (potentially). But instead of the party saying "Wow, what he was doing that we could pick up on?" they essentially start raging if anyone brings this up. Yes, oznabrag, I'm talking about you. Less rage, more thought, might be a more productive approach. But even among the more moderate responses here, there is a real defensiveness, a "vote for any Democrat or else" mentality that cannot tolerate being questioned. The same mentality that failed so spectacularly last time.


    Nonsense. No contradiction at all.

    And this:

    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    With most of what you've said on this thread, you haven't even disagreed with the people you think you're arguing with.
    shows a failure to understand my point. I'm not "arguing with" anyone. I am presenting an argument (in the academic sense) about what the strategically smart thing to do in 2020 is. And meeting a surprisingly defensive and emotional reaction from several posters here. Which suggests that they do not, in fact, agree with my take on things.

    Or is this the moment when you are telling me you agree?

    As for what positions of Clinton I take issue with, do you notice how you are going on about 2016? And I am focusing on 2020?

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  8. #253
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Posts
    10,200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canoeyawl View Post
    The problem seems to be how and why so many are convinced that Clinton was a poor candidate.
    Does anyone trying to tell us this actually know her? No, they just repeating the talking heads.
    Absolute proof that propaganda works.
    Clinton was likely the most competent candidate in our lifetime.

    It doesn't matter "how and why" people were/are convinced that HRC was/is a poor candidate. Neither does her competency matter. And it doesn't matter if those perceptions are true/correct. Whatever that means.

    What matters is that perception is EVERYTHING.

    Figuratively speaking, no matter how good, or fast, you are, if you start the 4k race with a 15 second penalty (and carrying 25kg on your back) ... you're extremely unlikely to win the race.
    You would not enjoy Nietzsche, sir. He is fundamentally unsound. P.G. Wodehouse (Carry On, Jeeves)

  9. #254
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    24,648

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by WI-Tom View Post
    oz,

    what in the world are you talking about? "People like me?" You're completely and utterly clueless.

    Tom
    Here.

    Get a clue.

    Quote Originally Posted by David G View Post
    Rattling the teacups.

  10. #255
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    24,648

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by WI-Tom View Post
    I agree with you. But my point is, lots of progressive voters don't, and won't. That point was made when 12% of voters who identify as Democratic or "leaning" Democratic voted for Trump.

    What I am saying on this thread is pure pragmatism. Since we know from experience that 12% of the likely D voters are willing to NOT vote for a D if they don't get a candidate they feel represents them, and Clinton supporters seem to be saying "We must hold our noses and vote for whoever ends up being the candidate"--well, it seems painfully obvious that Democratic voters would do well to pick a candidate who appeals to that 12% this time.

    So my message is not really to the DNC (though it'd be nice if they would be fair). And it's certainly not a message about 2016. It's to voters. To you people. And it's for 2020. If you want that 12% who abandoned the party last time, AND want to add young voters too, the best way to get them is to vote for a progressive candidate in the primary. After all, you'll all hold your noses and vote for any D. So make it a D that young voters and progressives--all of us--will vote for, too.

    Tom
    No.

    Pure pragmatism is holding your nose and voting for whoever ends up being the candidate.

    That's why the 'Republicans' win elections.


    What you are advocating for is for the 12% to be kowtowed to like a bunch of tantrum-pitching three-year-olds.

    No wonder they elected Trump.

    They are just like him.
    Rattling the teacups.

  11. #256
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    24,648

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by WI-Tom View Post
    Yes, oznabrag, I'm talking about you. Less rage, more thought,
    Tom
    Rage?

    You are clearly a man who has never stared into the face of stone cold fury.
    Rattling the teacups.

  12. #257
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast, Ca
    Posts
    21,601

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicholas Carey View Post
    It doesn't matter "how and why" people were/are convinced that HRC was/is a poor candidate. Neither does her competency matter. And it doesn't matter if those perceptions are true/correct. Whatever that means.

    What matters is that perception is EVERYTHING.

    Figuratively speaking, no matter how good, or fast, you are, if you start the 4k race with a 15 second penalty (and carrying 25kg on your back) ... you're extremely unlikely to win the race.
    Maybe, but I'm still going to run the race. Until the wheels come off.

    Who should I have voted for, any suggestions?

    Should I have written in Bernie, or Biden perhaps? It makes no difference who the candidate is, you have to vote the ticket or you are going to lose.

  13. #258
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hills of Vermont, USA
    Posts
    26,005

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    So, you agree that McMike is telling Clinton supporters that they're not wanted, and yet you seem to have taken his side? How does that make sense? Shouldn't a big tent include both Sanders supporters and Clinton supporters? Will Sanders supporters not come in the tent as long as there are Clinton supporters there? Why must Clinton be condemned for Sanders supporters to feel okay about participating in the Democratic Party?

    You need to get over your obsession with 2016 and look forward. You keep insisting on relitigating the last election, but 2020 is going to have its own dynamic. Clinton won't be there, so why do you insist that she must be condemned, and that telling Clinton supporters they're not wanted is the way forward?

    Claiming that anyone has said "we like what the Dem party is & are good with how it lost last time around" isn't accurate and serves no purpose. Rubbing peoples nose in the loss may make you feel better, insisting that the person who beat Bernie in the primaries was a horrible, terrible, not very good candidate may make you feel better, but Clinton won't be running next time, so what's the point? The party tried to reach out to Bernie's supporters in 2016, Clinton tried to reach out to his supporters and give them a chance to influence the platform, Bernie tried to get them to support Clinton in 2016, but the response to that outreach has been the sort of hostility we've seen on this thread.

    Once you've managed to let the Clinton supporters know they're not wanted in the party, you'll have a much smaller party. Maybe you think the purity is worth it, I think it's a small tent approach to the problem.


    OK - I have to put this thread (not the people who've posted to it) on ignore. Everyone is misinterpreting what I am trying to say - or else I am somehow being unclear. While I haven't read every post in perfect detail, I do not believe Clinton people should not be in the party or anything even vaguely like that! I do believe that they also need to accept that, even though she was far & away the best candidate in 2016, she had been compromised as a candidate (through no fault of her own) by a concerted attack over years & years by Bannon & other Republicans. She also ran a mediocre campaign. BUT WHO CARES????? That was then - this is now.

    I have said a number of times on this thread: the Dem party needs to be a bigger tent! How on earth can anyone get "Garret does not want Clinton supporters" out of that? Maybe I'm being completely unclear, or you guys are misunderstanding. I've even said 2016 is "water over the dam"!

    I will say this one last time: The Democratic party needs to welcome all parts of the party. Is that clear e-f'n-nough? The party needs to support all members. Doesn't matter if you're Joe Donnelly or Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez - if you won your primary, you should be supported & encouraged.

    I am not going to fit into your "the Dem party is perfect" mindset - 'cause it ain't even close. However, as long as you keep voting against Trump, McConnell, and Ryan (and their ilk), I can live with disagreeing about that.

    Over & out.
    "If it ain't broke, you're not trying." - Red Green

  14. #259
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    20,462

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Garret View Post
    OK - I have to put this thread (not the people who've posted to it) on ignore. Everyone is misinterpreting what I am trying to say - or else I am somehow being unclear. While I haven't read every post in perfect detail, I do not believe Clinton people should not be in the party or anything even vaguely like that! I do believe that they also need to accept that, even though she was far & away the best candidate in 2016, she had been compromised as a candidate (through no fault of her own) by a concerted attack over years & years by Bannon & other Republicans. She also ran a mediocre campaign. BUT WHO CARES????? That was then - this is now.

    I have said a number of times on this thread: the Dem party needs to be a bigger tent! How on earth can anyone get "Garret does not want Clinton supporters" out of that? Maybe I'm being completely unclear, or you guys are misunderstanding. I've even said 2016 is "water over the dam"!

    I will say this one last time: The Democratic party needs to welcome all parts of the party. Is that clear e-f'n-nough? The party needs to support all members. Doesn't matter if you're Joe Donnelly or Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez - if you won your primary, you should be supported & encouraged.

    I am not going to fit into your "the Dem party is perfect" mindset - 'cause it ain't even close. However, as long as you keep voting against Trump, McConnell, and Ryan (and their ilk), I can live with disagreeing about that.

    Over & out.
    Well. I can hear ya now! :P Honestly, I don't think there's even that much disagreement on any of this - but the dysfunction in this thread serves well illustrating how/why the Dems have so much trouble achieving success.
    There's a lot of things they didn't tell me when I signed on with this outfit....

  15. #260
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sequim, Washington
    Posts
    6,014

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by George Jung View Post
    Well. I can hear ya now! :P Honestly, I don't think there's even that much disagreement on any of this - but the dysfunction in this thread serves well illustrating how/why the Dems have so much trouble achieving success.
    We're fooked.
    PaulF

  16. #261
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    20,462

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Only if we, as a party, are incapable of 'taking a step back', look a bit dispassionately, and act accordingly. Need to vote. Need to vote for 'the best available option'. Protest votes are very much cutting off your nose to spite yer face.
    There's a lot of things they didn't tell me when I signed on with this outfit....

  17. #262
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sequim, Washington
    Posts
    6,014

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by George Jung View Post
    Only if we, as a party, are incapable of 'taking a step back', look a bit dispassionately, and act accordingly. Need to vote. Need to vote for 'the best available option'. Protest votes are very much cutting off your nose to spite yer face.
    But the "O ya...I'll show ya" attitude is strong here.

    Lets hope cooler minds prevail.
    PaulF

  18. #263
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    20,462

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Yup. See, we can get agreement! :P
    There's a lot of things they didn't tell me when I signed on with this outfit....

  19. #264
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    St. Paul, MN, USA
    Posts
    50,527

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    As Will Rogers said: "I belong to no organized party. I'm a Democrat."

    Now, it was even more true then; FDR's coalition had the white supremacist heirs of the Confederacy, the old northern ethnic city machines, unions, progressives of all kinds, actual socialists when such things still existed, and a whole grab bag of miscellaneous oddities. It's much less heterogeneous since the parties have sorted themselves out on left-right lines over the past 40 years - but the old habits die hard, and those who would rather lose than vote for an imperfect second-best candidate don't help at all.
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations,
    for nature cannot be fooled."

    Richard Feynman

  20. #265
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Entry Level
    Posts
    17,612

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by WI-Tom View Post
    I agree with you. But my point is, lots of progressive voters don't, and won't. That point was made when 12% of voters who identify as Democratic or "leaning" Democratic voted for Trump.

    What I am saying on this thread is pure pragmatism. Since we know from experience that 12% of the likely D voters are willing to NOT vote for a D if they don't get a candidate they feel represents them . . .
    Wait, I thought you were describing

    . . . Democratic voted for Trump.
    . . .not . . .

    willing to NOT vote for a D
    Is that two separate 12%'s?

    D's that voted for Trump are not D's. They can F right off.

    As for big tent, the white-girl-take-off-your-hoops people are welcome as long as they keep their mouths shut about their stupid stuff. Together we will reap the benefits. After the election, we can talk about earrings, having saved the republic that makes the discussion possible.
    He's a Mexican. -- Donald Trump.
    America cannot survive another four years of Barack Obama. -- Governor Chris Christie (R) New Jersey
    It wasn't racism, it was an attack on Christianity. -- Fox News
    Crying white mothers are ratings gold. -- National Rifle Association

  21. #266
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    24,650

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Garret View Post
    OK - I have to put this thread (not the people who've posted to it) on ignore. Everyone is misinterpreting what I am trying to say - or else I am somehow being unclear. While I haven't read every post in perfect detail, I do not believe Clinton people should not be in the party or anything even vaguely like that! I do believe that they also need to accept that, even though she was far & away the best candidate in 2016, she had been compromised as a candidate (through no fault of her own) by a concerted attack over years & years by Bannon & other Republicans. She also ran a mediocre campaign. BUT WHO CARES????? That was then - this is now.

    I have said a number of times on this thread: the Dem party needs to be a bigger tent! How on earth can anyone get "Garret does not want Clinton supporters" out of that? Maybe I'm being completely unclear, or you guys are misunderstanding. I've even said 2016 is "water over the dam"!

    I will say this one last time: The Democratic party needs to welcome all parts of the party. Is that clear e-f'n-nough? The party needs to support all members. Doesn't matter if you're Joe Donnelly or Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez - if you won your primary, you should be supported & encouraged.

    I am not going to fit into your "the Dem party is perfect" mindset - 'cause it ain't even close. However, as long as you keep voting against Trump, McConnell, and Ryan (and their ilk), I can live with disagreeing about that.

    Over & out.
    Shouting won't help, and continuing to misrepresent what other people have said won't help either. No one on this thread has said the Democratic Party is perfect. I know it's easier to argue against straw men, but it isn't useful.

    Yes, you've said you don't want to talk about 2016. Then you've talked about 2016. For example, you keep telling us Clinton was a terrible candidate because Republicans had said terrible things about her. Jettisoning any candidate your opponent criticizes will allow your opponent to choose your candidate, which seems like a very bad strategy. For example, they could lay off the weaker candidate until after the primaries so that they'd have him to run against. like they did during the year you claim you don't want to talk about, then keep talking about.

    Yes, you said you want a bigger tent. I've already outlined why I think your approach to the party is a small-tent strategy. The problem is not that I haven't understood you, it's that I disagree with you. You can claim you want a big-tent party 'til you're blue in the face, but if your way of achieving that is to tell Clinton supporters that they are a bunch of poo-heads, I respectfully submit that what you propose is really a small-tent approach.

    Now, maybe I'm misunderstanding you. To me, supporting the proposition that:

    Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    . . . they admit that Hillary Clinton was a huge mistake and a horrible candidate. Trump will win a second term if the Democratic Party exposes their flawed judgement and apologizes. You want votes, clean up the spilt milk.
    ...is divisive, and likely to fracture the progressives rather than unite them. From everything you've said, I've assumed that you support the OP. If you don't, you should say so, because you taking that side is what makes me think your strategy isn't really going to lead to a big-tent party.

    You made a reference to
    telling people (in so many words or by actions) they're not wanted.
    To which I responded:

    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    Isn't that what McMike is telling Clinton supporters?
    Instead of telling me how that fits with your big-tent approach, you said:
    Yep (though he did say he voted for her) - and you guys seem to be saying "We like what the Dem party is & are good with how it lost last time around."
    Here's my problem. You say you want a big-tent approach, you shout it in bold face, but the totality of your argument seems to be that Clinton's supporters were poo-heads who can only redeem themselves by rejecting all they have been in the past and accepting the good word of Sanders-style progressivism. If your idea of a big tent is to insult your would-be allies, mischaracterize what they've said, and claim they can only redeem themselves by accepting your beliefs as gospel, then regardless of what you say you want, you'll end up with a smaller tent.

    If that's not what you meant to say, you need to explain why the words you used seem to say that.

    I really think part of the problem is that while the Democrats tried to reach out to Sanders supporters, it could never be enough. They were ripe for being exploited by the people who stole the DNC's emails and made the arguments that you, McMike, and a lot of Russian trolls have made. One of the things the DNC does is support candidates. In your view, they weren't sufficiently open to Bernie's insurgent campaign. Well and good, I certainly think they should have had more debates, for example, and it seems to me that they've learned a bit and are now open to more progressive candidates. One thing they've done that has angered Sanders supporters is insist that to be eligible for the nomination, people have to be Democrats, and Bernie isn't one. That hasn't been mentioned on this thread, but I think it's part of what keeps the resentment burning. It indicates that the Democrats have learned more than one lesson. One is that they should be more open to progressive candidates. Another, judging from that rule change, is that when people who are not part of the party try to use the party apparatus to further their ambitions, it can wreck the party. Well, you wanted them to learn from 2016, and that's one of the lessons they took away. We are not in control of what lessons other people learn from events. In any case, even a rule change Sanders supporters will hate shows that they are intent on not repeating the problems they had in 2016. Instead, they are working on a process that will result in a new set of problems. I think they should be open to outsiders, but like Bernie, I've never registered as a Democrat, so I guess I don't get to make their rules.

    You keep claiming that nothing was learned from 2016, but that's not the problem. The problem is that the DNC learned different lessons than you wanted them to.

  22. #267
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Northern California Mountains
    Posts
    13,207

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    I'm meeting a suprsingly defensive and emotional reaction
    Welcome to the club.

    You're discovering that the bunch here doesn't like being told they're wrong about anything nor do they accept thoughtful criticism, no matter how fairly or patiently argued.

    I suggest approaching it with no expectations of any kind, and just have fun with it.

  23. #268
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,349

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Sky Blue View Post

    You're discovering that the bunch here doesn't like being told they're wrong about anything nor do they accept thoughtful criticism, no matter how fairly or patiently argued.
    This. Glad not to be involved in this thread. Time to vote.

  24. #269
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Northern NSW Australia
    Posts
    73,448

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Sky Blue View Post
    Welcome to the club.

    You're discovering that the bunch here doesn't like being told they're wrong about anything nor do they accept thoughtful criticism, no matter how fairly or patiently argued.

    I suggest approaching it with no expectations of any kind, and just have fun with it.
    You do recognise yourself in your second sentence ?
    '' You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know. ''
    Grateful Dead

  25. #270
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Northern California Mountains
    Posts
    13,207

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterSibley View Post
    You do recognise yourself in your second sentence ?
    Peter, this thread is not about me. It seems to be about, currently, how the Democrats here are unable to have a meaningful discussion.

    I'm merely suggesting that this ought not come as a surprise to anyone.

  26. #271
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    24,648

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    To paraphrase Paul Pless, 'Progressives are entitled morons.'

    MORONS!

    Oblivious-to-political-reality, willing-to-send-the-US-into-political-chaos-because-waaaaah!, willing-to-suffer-decades-if-not-centuries-of-brutal-totalitarian-dictatorship-because-their-precious-feewings-are-not-being-signed-into-law-anti-democratic-entitled lumps of animated feces, MORONS.


    The 'Republican' Party are criminals, you pathetic morons.

    If you elect Democrats, you have a slim chance.

    If you elect 'Republicans', you will be slaughtered.

    It really is Just. That. Simple.
    Rattling the teacups.

  27. #272
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    24,650

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Another message of unity.

    Prior to this thread, I thought there was a chance the Democrats could get their act together. The snails have fallen from my eyes.

  28. #273
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    24,648

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    Another message of unity.

    Prior to this thread, I thought there was a chance the Democrats could get their act together. The snails have fallen from my eyes.
    The orcs understand unity.

    the 'liberal', 'progressive' MORONS do NOT.

    Therefore, the orcs win.
    Rattling the teacups.

  29. #274
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Osborne Russell View Post
    Is that two separate 12%'s?
    I have no idea what you mean here. No, obviously it's not two separate 12%s. Read my post again. I think it's pretty clear what I'm saying.

    Quote Originally Posted by Osborne Russell View Post
    D's that voted for Trump are not D's. They can F right off.
    Now THERE'S a "big tent" philosophy. You do realize that the party needs their votes to win, right?

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  30. #275
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by oznabrag View Post
    The orcs understand unity.

    the 'liberal', 'progressive' MORONS do NOT.

    Therefore, the orcs win.
    So your solution is to become an orc. Sorry, not interested. Good luck with that.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  31. #276
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by oznabrag View Post
    Here.

    Get a clue.
    Posting a cartoon about people who didn't vote for Clinton and trying to use it as ammo against someone who DID is pure idiocy.

    Oz, go take a break. Calm down. Realize that we're potential allies and stop trying to beat me into submission.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  32. #277
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    northwestern Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,025

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Quote Originally Posted by oznabrag View Post
    Pure pragmatism is holding your nose and voting for whoever ends up being the candidate.
    Oz, you are talking about the general election. I'm talking about the primary. Dem voters would be wise to choose a candidate in the primary who will appeal to the voters they failed to get last time. That's pragmatism.

    Quote Originally Posted by oznabrag View Post
    What you are advocating for is for the 12% to be kowtowed to like a bunch of tantrum-pitching three-year-olds.
    Translation: Do whatever it takes to get a Democrat elected. But don't ask ME to do whatever it takes. I'd rather pitch a tantrum about the people who pitched a tantrum last time, even if it gets Trump re-elected.

    You really do need to calm down and stop insulting and whining about the very people you need to get the result you say you want in 2020. You're so blinded by over-emotional reaction that you can't even see we're allies. Or should be.

    Tom
    You don't have to be prepared as long as you're willing to suffer the consequences.

    www.tompamperin.com

  33. #278
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hills of Vermont, USA
    Posts
    26,005

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    John -

    I said I was done here & I am - but a parting comment. I do not understand where this thread has gone (I'm an orc because I lean progressive?) - but there's enough nastiness so that I've chosen not to participate anymore. For the record, I never thought Clinton was a terrible candidate (& apologies if my agreement with Mike on some things gave you you impression I felt that way). I did think she ran a pretty lame campaign - but felt she was otherwise very competent.

    I have zero issue with Clinton supporters being in the party (remember - I'm the one who used the term "big tent") - but I do have an issue when they say that Clinton lost because of Bernie.

    The important thing is that we all vote next month & hopefully vote against anyone in the Republican party. I have "voted the person" in the past, but anyone still a member of the party of Trump needs to lose this time around.
    "If it ain't broke, you're not trying." - Red Green

  34. #279
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pa.
    Posts
    3,447

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    We would be in a very different place if the supreme court had not chosen Bush Vs Gore. At some point the popular vote should matter.
    If he ever drinks the brew of 10 tanna leaves, he will become a monster the likes of which the world has never seen



  35. #280
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    20,462

    Default Re: Democrats will never get redemption until . . .

    Some here appear to be purposely obtuse. I wish you’d stop. Antagonizing your allies is dumb, and exactly what rick and kablooie desire. Bottom line, if you want to win- support your favored candidate in the primary- get as much of your issues in the platform- but for gosh sakes!- vote Democrat in the general! And vote! Don’t assume it’s in the bag, or do a protest vote! We should have had two more honest SC justices. National Health Care. Reduced MIC spending. Better education. Stronger environmental protection. On and on. That’s what we flushed down the crapper this last time around. We don’t have the luxury of a repeat performance.
    There's a lot of things they didn't tell me when I signed on with this outfit....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •