Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Outrigger location

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Vienna, Virginia
    Posts
    4

    Default Outrigger location

    16' canoe, 8' outriggers. how does putting all three centers inline compare with having the three bows inline?

    this would be flat water lake, some larger river/bay sailing.

    outriggers would be flown or just barely touching water





  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Duncan, Vancouver Island
    Posts
    26,216

    Default Re: Outrigger location

    I'm going to guess that optimal outrigger placement has to be sorted out with the sail plan, assuming this set up is for sailing. If its for paddling only I'd guess in the middle would make maneuvering easier. Close to the middle, or just slightly aft seems common

    Last edited by JimD; 05-10-2017 at 10:03 AM.
    There is no rational, logical, or physical description of how free will could exist. It therefore makes no sense to praise or condemn anyone on the grounds they are a free willed self that made one choice but could have chosen something else. There is no evidence that such a situation is possible in our Universe. Demonstrate otherwise and I will be thrilled.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    springfield, missouri, usa
    Posts
    554

    Default Re: Outrigger location

    I imagine placement has to do with what kind of stability you're going for and the size and shape of your outriggers/amas. Do you always want to sail it flat like a trimaran? Or are they to be more like the gull wing amas on a Solway-Dory sailing canoe and used primarily as safety floats/training wheels. 8' amas would probably be more for flat sailing and inline with the boat center. What experience I have with large single outriggers, that makes sense to me. I think they'd move forward more if they were smaller or your main hull was shaped fuller forward. Canoes are usually prettysymmetrical fore and aft. If yours is, I'd say put them center.

    Someone more versed might come along soon. There's also an Outrigger and Proa thread that you could pose the question on. Several designers chime in there.

    -Trevor

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Vienna, Virginia
    Posts
    4

    Default Re: Outrigger location

    appreciate the replies. i have seen production boats with either configuration hence my question.

    primarily i'm concerned about stability because my two sons are smaller and I dont want to flip the canoe. its is not a high performance boat and we will not be breaking any speed records. initially i had thought to use much smaller flown outriggers like on the solway dory canoes but figured perhaps bigger might be better if I can rig up a trampoline system ala the hobie island kayak my boys can goof around with a bit more room.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,497

    Default Re: Outrigger location

    First off, you need to know where the center of buoyancy of the outriggers or floats or amas, such as they are called, is located. Most amas locate the center of buoyancy forward of the centerline, but many simpler amas made for canoes and kayaks are symetrical fore and aft or close to it.

    When your boat is pressed hard, the lift provided by the ama will act at the center of buoyancy, so you have to think about how this will affect the trim of the main hull. The standard approach is to put the center of buoyancy of the ama ahead of the center of buoyancy of the main hull (vaka to some.) In doing this, as the boat heels, the main hull assumes a bow-up attitude. This is good for insuring said bow doesn't dive beneath the waves, and is the safest approach. If taken too far, it will adversely affect performance, but it's definitely the safer configuration.

    The easy answer to your question is to just line the bows up, and if the amas are symmetrical fore and aft this would probably be a good way to go. If your amas are fuller forward, then the bows should most likely (we're dealing here without any numbers to work with) be aft of the main hull a bit. What you don't want to see is any of the bows diving underwater, and when the amas are further forward, they tend to work in concert with the main hull to keep the water under the boat, not over it.

    Any photos to share?
    -Dave

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Santa Fe NM
    Posts
    115

    Default Re: Outrigger location

    Storer has a good outrigger plan for sale, at a good price too, not sure if you have seen in. It is the larger style, not the Soloway type, so you could tramplolean it for the boys. Storer seams pretty helpful if you get those plans My guess is he would help with placement and such.

    http://www.storerboatplans.com/wp/bo...ailing-videos/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Whangarei New Zealand
    Posts
    351

    Default Re: Outrigger location

    Quote Originally Posted by Woxbox View Post
    First off, you need to know where the center of buoyancy of the outriggers or floats or amas, such as they are called, is located. Most amas locate the center of buoyancy forward of the centerline, but many simpler amas made for canoes and kayaks are symetrical fore and aft or close to it.

    When your boat is pressed hard, the lift provided by the ama will act at the center of buoyancy, so you have to think about how this will affect the trim of the main hull. The standard approach is to put the center of buoyancy of the ama ahead of the center of buoyancy of the main hull (vaka to some.) In doing this, as the boat heels, the main hull assumes a bow-up attitude. This is good for insuring said bow doesn't dive beneath the waves, and is the safest approach. If taken too far, it will adversely affect performance, but it's definitely the safer configuration.

    The easy answer to your question is to just line the bows up, and if the amas are symmetrical fore and aft this would probably be a good way to go. If your amas are fuller forward, then the bows should most likely (we're dealing here without any numbers to work with) be aft of the main hull a bit. What you don't want to see is any of the bows diving underwater, and when the amas are further forward, they tend to work in concert with the main hull to keep the water under the boat, not over it.

    Any photos to share?
    This concurs with my understanding of an outrigger ama, which in the OP case appears to be intended as a float, or leeward ama.
    Diagonal stability will improve as the float is moved forward, but there comes a point where the displacement volume is over-pressed and it dives and will be tripped over.
    Diagonal stability achieved by shifting live ballast out to w/ward and sternwards will help to prevent nosedives. So an outrigger beam further aft will help when hiking out here. This probably means two outrigger beams are need each side one towards the stern of the float and one further forwards.
    Placement of these beams depends on how far aft they can connect to the float. At 8 float length, the after beam will be right on the pointy end of the float (if canoe shaped) when its other end lines up with the centre hull bow.... on account the the main hull, canoe vaka or boat being 16' length

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •