Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Mainsheet traveler placement?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Provincetown, MA
    Posts
    5,022

    Default

    Hi, folks... I'm making some decisions on hardware placement now that the deck is almost framed in. Most things are pretty well detailed in the plans or are self explanatory. But I have to make a pretty basic choice now with regard to the mainsheet traveler before installing the support blocking for it. The plans, (and common sense/tradition...) call for the traveler to be mounted right aft, just forward of the deck edge. The traveler wlll be a simple "U" shaped bronze rod thru-bolted to the backing blocks. But SWMBO's insistance on SOME form of auxiliary power and a sweet deal on one of those neat, bronze, removeable outboard engine brackets will interfere with placing the traveler where it ought to be unless I put the engine well off to one side. Not a very practical solution with my VERY narrow transom. (Probably also mean having to go with a much shorter traveler than I need/want as well) My initial thought is to simply move the traveler far enough forward to place the engine bracket mounting "plate" aft of it. This would only mean shifting the traveler about 6 or 8 inches forward of the location shown in the plans. I realise this will change the geometry of the mainsheet lead down from the boom topping, but we aren't talking about a very "high tech" rig here... Splice at the boom topping leading down through the deck/traveler block, up to a second block on a boom bale mounted about a third of the way along the boom and finally down to a cleat in the cockpit. It occurs to me I may want a slighty shorter "run" to the traveler since it would be farther forward and that it may not "look" quite right somehow, not being right aft, but are there any other, less obvious problems with this scheme that haven't occured to me yet? Thanks... This is the first real deviation from the plans that I've contemplated, so I'm a bit hesitant...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    NWly shores of Lake Whitehall, MA
    Posts
    7,208

    Default

    Another approach, might work, might convince SWMBO , haul a real tender with an outboard. If you need power, haul it up alongside, secure appropriately, fire it up and away you go .

    The sweet lines of your Dark Harbor remain unsullied.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Virgin Islands
    Posts
    2,177

    Default

    Art, I'm looking at some old pictures of S+S Dark Harbors and they aren't much help. They have no traveller, only a dbl sheave block on deck and what looks like a single sheave with a becket at the boom ends. Interestingly, the sheet is led along the boom all the way forward to the mast and down to the 'cabin' top.

    Anyway, I should think it wouldn't matter too much if you moved the traveller forward a few inches as long as you moved the bail on the boom forward to the same degree. I'd rig it so the sheet's standing end attached to the boom end, then down to traveller gear, back up to boom at revised position, and on per design from there. Ya folla? You'd probably be disqualified from strict one-design competition, if that sort of thing is important to you ( and if there even is a one-design fleet of Crowninshield's DH12) 'course I'm no expert. Good luck...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    2,360

    Default

    I'm not familiar with the boat, Art, but I'd have to agree that moving it forward a few inches won't make much difference.

    In principle, though, the further forward it goes the less leverage it exerts -- if someone suggested mounting the horse on the cabintop, for instance, then you'd probably need to redesign the sheeting system and possibly also the boom.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    1,242

    Default

    Art, correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that your transom is so narrow, that traveller really won't do a lot of good... you could pretty much replace it with a single block, and not tell much of a difference... I may be way off base here, but that's my first thought.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Auckland ,N.Z.
    Posts
    17,192

    Default

    Sounds a bit light on purchase Art, ( this coming from Mr less is best)( hate that friction) but I wouldn't be worried about moving the traveller inboard.
    I ended up with, and like the double ended type because it removes the conflict with the tiller and you can chuck both off to ease in a hurry. Mine's now set up as a 6:1 but was a 4:1. The latter would ease in the light( acceptable friction) and gave plenty to haul in with.

    this is the only one I have showing the mainsheet. You can see what I mean about staying out of the way of the tiller though. It can be lead to the free winch if necessary.

    [This message has been edited by John B (edited 09-06-2001).]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Whangarei, New Zealand
    Posts
    645

    Default

    First question is how long is your boom and how big is the sail.

    Followed by do you race or cruse.

    A mainsheet that is say only 2/3 the way along the boom will use far less sheet which saves a lot of tangels in the cockpit. However we have this with a 4:1 on a 380 sq ft sail and hard on the wind have to really swing on it to get the leach in tight if it is windy. The traverler is on the cabin top.
    This works for us as we have less sheet, and no risk of being hit by flying blocks in a tack etc, as well since we have no boom vane the travel further forward gives us more sail control.
    So unless you have a very large sail moving the traveler forward should not be a problem with respect to load.


    As the previous poster noted if you have a narrow transom and are into crusing why not go to quarter sheeting with a block in each corner. Not so efficent at controlling the sail but looks good, very simple, and cost effective.

    Have you considered a rope traveler?


    Zane

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Auckland ,N.Z.
    Posts
    17,192

    Default

    Found another one.

    I found one of those deck plate turning blocks secondhand and got another cast off it. Merriman I think. The system works very well. A 4:1 has one less block on the horse and was good for us with a 425 ft sail and a 20ft boom. I needed to change to 6:1 because I couldnt get the new 600 ft main in. LOL.( weakling)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Provincetown, MA
    Posts
    5,022

    Default

    Thanks, Guys! Took a another long look at the original sailplan. I'd forgotten all about the tiller being above the aft deck! Guess I'm going to need at least one more turning block on deck aft of the tiller after all. I was envisioning the setup on our old family boat with the tiller mounted below the the aft cockpit coaming. Hmmmm.... Perhaps a double ended sheet WOULD make more sense. At any rate, the original sailplan does show the simple setup described above, with the standing part starting with an eyesplice through the end of the boom, through the traveler block and up to the boom bale, but then it continues through another turn block aft of the tiller and then to a cleat mounted just to stbd. and forward. Very similar to what we had with the bigger, family boat. This sail is only 166 sq. feet. Does seem like it might be a bit ackward to tend when on the port tack. Then again, it's a pretty narrow boat! Nothing's going to be very far away no matter where it is! I guess it worked for the originals? Anyway, I've got awhile to mull that part over. Sounds like the consensus is that moving the traveler forward is feasable? I think that's the way I'm going to go. I noticed the DH 17 1/2 has it's sheet "profile" similar to what I propose, so I guess it won't look too out of character. Ed, as for your suggestion, believe me, I tried it! But she makes a good point. The whole idea for this boat is to have something quick and easy to up and get out on the water at a momement's notice should the impulse hit. Rigging a dingy on the hip just to get out of an ackward slip or towing one behind every time we go out just in case the wind dies, kind of defeats the purpose. The plans show oarlocks on the coamings and I plan to use them whenever practical, but I'm not convinced she's really gonna be very manageable under oar. I think this removeable bracket will make a good compromise. Unless I want to use it, it and the engine will live stowed away somewhere amidships in a water/fuel proof plastic storage container of some sort. The only visible evidence that she's not a "virgin" will be the small, (about 2" x 6")
    bronze mounting "plate" behind the traveler. Thanks for the ideas, folks!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    NWly shores of Lake Whitehall, MA
    Posts
    7,208

    Default

    Definately go with the two-ended sheet arrangement, you'll be glad you did.

  11. #11

    Default

    So, WHEN are we gonna get to see your latest progress, Art, my good man?! I'm seriously thinking of building a Dark Harbor 12 and need some inspiration!

    Happy "travelling" -

    TL

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    vancouver,b.c.,canada
    Posts
    2,487

    Default

    Excuse my ignorence but how does a double ended sheet work?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    2,360

    Default

    Here's about the simplest arrangement, Gert, giving a 2:1 purchase.




    Each end, after leading through its quarter-block (cf JohnB's turning blocks,) can be belayed on a cleat immediately forward of the block, inside the gunwale. The end you're not using for the moment gets cleated off while you hang on to the other one.

    When you want to shift sides (normally when you change tack,) you cleat off the old working end -- which then becomes the new deadend -- and cast off the old deadend, which is now your new working end.

    Apart from anything else, such an arrangement helps even out the wear on the sheet, too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •