Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Fast and Furious

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Wickford, RI
    Posts
    3,389

    Default Fast and Furious

    Where ever you stand on this issue, I learned something amazing from a NYT editorial this am.
    F&F ran from 2009 to 2011, I don't know what months, but let's say about 1,000 days,
    Holder has turned over 7,600 documents,
    and it involved 2,000 guns.
    That is 7.6 documents per day, including weekends and holidays and almost 4 documents per gun!
    No wonder they lost track of them they were too busy typing and filing.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    North West Arkansas
    Posts
    50,022

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    I'm hoping we 'remember' this next November
    The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
    Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Hyannis, MA, USA
    Posts
    28,745

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    We should remember the basic story line: How the arms programs were set up during the Bush years but then how Bush and Republicans in Congress refused to appoint a permanent director for BATF resulting in certain field offices getting way out of control; how a brave BATF agent who could not break the news up the administration past the non-extistent director level finally leaked it to the press; and how the Obama administration, while protective of all executive actions including those of the previous administration did not with hold any of the actual story. Like that's how we know about F&F. What the Republicans are fishing for is not evidence of the crimes - they and all others have that - but evidence that after they and the public had it the Obama administration still had something to hide.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Wickford, RI
    Posts
    3,389

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    The fact that it was started under Bush would make me think Holder would like to expose it, not hide stuff.
    And if Issa hasn't found something substantive in those 7,600 dicuments, what is in them?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    North West Arkansas
    Posts
    50,022

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    Jeeze... I should have known... yet another 'It's Bush's fault'

    no matter. I seem to recall hope and change... maybe I misheard and it was actually dope and mange
    The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
    Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Hyannis, MA, USA
    Posts
    28,745

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    I'm more generalized that it's the Republicans fault. There is a cluster who are so against the BATF that they have blocked the appointment of a director. This inevitably leads to a lousy agency filled with waste and idiots out of control. They then point out how it does not work.

    I frankly think that BAFT, DHS and a number of these security agencies are bad administration leading to bad policy by whatever administration is in power. The way to deal with that is to upfront deal. The way is not to sabatoge the congressional and executive branches to ensure that citizen rights will be violated.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sharon, MA
    Posts
    40,674

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    Quote Originally Posted by David W Pratt View Post
    The fact that it was started under Bush would make me think Holder would like to expose it, not hide stuff.
    And if Issa hasn't found something substantive in those 7,600 dicuments, what is in them?
    You might want to google Issa, and learn about HIS background.... his attempt to project an image of 'righteousness' and 'indignance' is rather humorous, in context.
    Tish happens (I'm dyslexic)



  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    North West Arkansas
    Posts
    50,022

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian McColgin View Post
    I'm more generalized that it's the Republicans fault. There is a cluster who are so against the BATF that they have blocked the appointment of a director. This inevitably leads to a lousy agency filled with waste and idiots out of control. They then point out how it does not work.

    I frankly think that BAFT, DHS and a number of these security agencies are bad administration leading to bad policy by whatever administration is in power. The way to deal with that is to upfront deal. The way is not to sabatoge the congressional and executive branches to ensure that citizen rights will be violated.
    are you assigning motive?
    The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
    Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    St. Paul, MN, USA
    Posts
    33,416

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    . . . are you assigning motive?
    One doesn't have to be too paranoid to see a pattern where some in the party that is reflexively opposed to the federal government try to make it work badly.

    This was a moderately serious screwup under two administrations. Mr. Issa's grandstanding isn't helping.

    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations,
    for nature cannot be fooled."

    Richard Feynman

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Delmar NY
    Posts
    444

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    Quote Originally Posted by David W Pratt View Post
    The fact that it was started under Bush would make me think Holder would like to expose it, not hide stuff.
    And if Issa hasn't found something substantive in those 7,600 dicuments, what is in them?
    Issa was informed of the program back in 2009. He didn't say squat about it then.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    Hyannis, MA, USA
    Posts
    28,745

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    We have here two motives coming happily together. The far right cluster has openly thwarted two presidents from appointing a BAFT director because they want the agency to go so bad, destroy so many innocent lives, that it will be eliminated. They are not, by the way, representatives of some booze or tobacco lobbies. And the R's are enthusiastic about doing anything to make Obama's efforts at governance fail.

    Just look at the actual documents they claim to be searching for - nothing about F&F itself. It's all about when, after F&F became public, the AG knew it was public. Bahdahboom.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    'tween maine & arizona.. usually
    Posts
    2,788

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    They are not, by the way, representatives of some booze or tobacco lobbies.
    Wait, wait, Don't tell me! Firearms, right? Did I get it, Huh, huh, did I, did I?.. ;-)

    Wondering.. how does this relate with "DEA Gently Chastized"

    Hmmm...

    enjoy
    bobby

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Entry Level
    Posts
    7,569

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    What can the Congressional investigation reasonably be expected to produce? What seems to me The Worst was known a long time ago -- that these manuvers were carried out without informing Mexico. If the roles were reversed the American right and maybe even the middle and the left would be calling for sanctions if not war. Surely every American can unite behind the policy that we won't do to others what we don't want done to us.

    The other claims, that Obama is selling guns to finance his campaign, get rich, take away your guns and advance world communism, well . . . let facts be submitted to a candid world. Congress has limited resources and it's difficult to avoid the impression that this is merely a way to ensure that they are frittered away, until the Red Army is back in the saddle.
    America cannot survive another four years of Barack Obama. -- Governor Chris Christie (R) New Jersey

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Traverse City and Saline, MI
    Posts
    1,870

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    Quote Originally Posted by Osborne Russell View Post
    ...Surely every American can unite behind the policy that we won't do to others what we don't want done to us.
    I assume this was meant to provoke bitter hilarity.
    The map is not the territory. A. Korzybski

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14,056

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    i wonder which has caused more mayhem, guns smuggled into mexico or drugs smuggled into the usa?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    15,153

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    I'm hoping we 'remember' this next November
    You're going to base your vote on THIS? Why don't people like this show up on voter purge lists?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Eagan, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    9,694

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    7600 pages, not 7600 documents.

    This is Obama's program. Bush had a different program.

    The big difference was that Bush's program had the knowledge and assistance of the Mexican government, Obama's didn't.

    Oh, and no one was killed in Bush's program.

    Pesky details.
    Await dreams, loves, life; | There is always tomorrow. | Until there is not.

    Grieving love unsaid. | Tomorrow will fail someday. | Tell them today, OK?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle. WA
    Posts
    17,224

    Default Re: Fast and Furious

    Quote Originally Posted by John of Phoenix View Post
    You're going to base your vote on THIS? Why don't people like this show up on voter purge lists?
    The disclosures so far would seem to indicate that F&F was a bad idea poorly administered and now (unless things have changed since last night when I last read about it elsewhere) being run away from instead of being addressed directly. Still, small potatoes, at best and although a gaff, hardly one of major consequences. Still, I wonder what happened here?

    What we really should be discussing is legalizing or decriminalizing marijuana. If the administration wants to move the process forward, that's what it should be selling both in Mexico and here. Time has come to get crime out of this business at the root.
    Last edited by Lew Barrett; 06-22-2012 at 04:33 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •