Anyone seen this? Comments??
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...ians-urge.html
Anyone seen this? Comments??
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...ians-urge.html
Could this be the first step down the (slippery?) slope towards unisex public facilities?
Conferences at the top level are always courteous. Name calling is left to the foreign ministers. (Averell Harriman)
horse hiss
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
This Swedish political party that's urging this wouldn't be known as the Pee Party, would it? Sounds about as stupid as our Tea Party's notions.
Doug
From the "Surely they have more important things to worry about!" department.
Cheers,
Bobby
I started a thread on this. Got one reply:
What they ought to do is **** can equality and put 15% (or what ever is appropriate) more toilets in the lady's
from Mr. Pratt. An excellent suggestion, IMHO.
Tom
In the harbor, or at sea
The gentleman sailor
Sits to pee
On various boats' heads I've had a sign that said"
"Gentlemen, your aim is not a match for Mother Ocean's little pranks. If you must stand to do what you're doing, go to the leeward rail. If you're going to do it in here, sit down."
But seriously, how about a rational compromise of unisex sit-downs AND a pissoire.