anyone that thinks they bear no responsibility for the fall of their shot should not be allowed to own a firearm
anyone that thinks they bear no responsibility for the fall of their shot should not be allowed to own a firearm
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible that you may be mistaken." (stolen from TomF )
Cripes.
Let's all take a step back, OK? There's a whole lot of agreement among us all - shall we recognize it?
- Pretty much everybody's agreed that newbies moving into a neighbourhood should deal with the businesses that pre-date them in the neighbourhood - be that gun ranges, hog farms, whatever. Nobody's argued that the range shouldnt' exist, nobody's argued that the homeowners down-range should put the range out of business for "nuisance" stuff like noise, traffic etc.
- Everybody's agreed that safety has to be a primary concern with gun use. It's fundamental in hunter training, it's fundamental in "good citizenship" ways of being a gun owner too.
- Nobody's argued for taking away anybody's guns, or regulating them differently. No, shooting isn't an "essential" in people's lives like air or food, but this isn't some anti-gun blathering thread. There is a potential deep end here, but nobody's jumped off into it.
- I truly think that everyone also agrees that at least optimally, a range's bullets should always stay on the range. And that ranges should be set up so that they do - providing a venue for safe shooting is part of the reason ranges exist, after all.
Where we're disagreeing is on whether the homeowners are responsible to put up with the very occasional bullets travelling in their direction from the range, because the range was there before their houses. Or whether despite being there first, the range is responsible to keep all bullets within bounds so people aren't liable to be injured or killed.
I frankly don't understand why this last bit is even in question - as it wouldn't be for any other business ... or for any new range people wanted to create. But maybe we can focus on that, within the context of where we do agree.
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Phillip, since you refuse to read with understanding, think with clarity, or recognize people who are actually supportive of shooting sports at their honorable and finest, I can't see that taking a turn makes sense.
You have mentioned how easily you go from feeling attacked to defensive to your own attack mode. I'm not quite like that, not attacking and not defending - just trying to get at the issues as we learn the facts.
So take a moment to review the news stories and maybe use google earth to get a notion of the geography. Maybe even learn a bit about how the more progressive ranges have worked on alternative models of how to recapture and/or sequester spent lead. There are many real and troubling issues that the sport must cope with in the different environments where people shoot.
Ian.. I agree with most of #60. Just one point. I was, as you were, at a boatyard in Maine a few years ago. The yard was going through hoops to sell it without much luck primarily due to toxins in the soil..no takers at that time. I doubt the club was going to open a potential can of worms to put it on the market knowing what could be there..The rest..fine
Philip, as the word gun was in the thread title would you consider yourself one of the "usual suspects" that immediately showed up?![]()
Oh now you've done it, Tom F. You've tried to introduce reason and rationality into a pissing match between a bunch of four year olds. How dare you?!
Phillip and Jamie: do either of you believe that the gun club has no obligation to take steps to ensure that the members' rounds stay within the confines of the club grounds? Do you seriously believe that since the homes were built after the gun club, the owners should just shut up and tolerate the occasional bullet coming their way?
I hope not, but that's what it sounds like you're all saying.
Last edited by BrianY; 04-27-2012 at 04:45 PM.
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
I can scarcely believe my eyes!
Phillip and Jamie in tandem coming down on the dumb side of a controversy...AGAIN!LMAO!
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
Do Jamie and Phillip grasp the Fact that the gun club does not own the property Downrange and is not free to drop random bullets into it?
No?
I figgered!
Anywhere bullets land is an act of God according to Phillip and Jamie and only LIBS would say otherwise.
Hey, Jamie, show your famous Laurel and Hardy dancing video!![]()
Last edited by Glen Longino; 04-27-2012 at 06:00 PM.
Yes dweeble, I do.Glen, And as usual, the BS from you is just that. Did I say it was an act of God, No. Figures.I'm not gonna bother with you anymore and will take your advice: Don't feed the troll."You are certainly not worth responding to.I feel sorry for the other residents of TX though having you live in the state. I'm only glad for them that TX is a very big state..
"Yes dweeble, I do.Glen, And as usual, the BS from you is just that."
Translation: Although I am an educated man who has formally taught children as a professional teacher, I love to make up words, avoid all rules of grammar and punctuation, and eshew all schools of philosophy, reason, sociology, and etiquette.
Furthermore, I am an elite Colonial American with roots in the keel of the Mayflower, while you, Glen, are a blight upon the people of Texas...Amen!LMAO
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
If you looked up the word,dweeble, you would see it exists with a definition. You might try doing that before you stick both hooves into that gaping orifice you call a mouth glenny.
General Blight!![]()
I looked up dweeble
there are several definations but this is the one I personally like:
A dweeble is someone (or animal) who amazes and astounds others with their adorable presence. They have a magnetic personality, are mysterious and do exactly what they want, when they want. Others admire their free spirit.
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
Hmm you're righthttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dweebleA small, platypus-like animal that hangs around inside your pants and forces you to tell you the truth by slowly gnawing on your inner thighs.
I've been exceedingly patient with you, Jamie!
I'll tell you this one more time:
Your self-righteous and pompous attitude prompts you to call me all sorts of names other than Glen, my actual name.
The next time you call call me "glenny", "Hardy", "dweeble", or any name other than Glen, I promise to complain to Scot that you are a Rude Hombre who has a bad habit of entitled Rudeness.
I don't want to see you get banned.
I enjoy kicking your sanctimonious butt around here, but if you continue to be rude to me I will click the big black triangle.
Be warned!
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
The firing range should be legally bound to ensure that 100% of rounds fired on its property remain on its property.
Sorry this thread has been taken so far from an interesting and important issue.
It's amazing what a few serial posters can do to a thread.
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
Personal failures are too important to be trusted to others.
Airlie, you are too funny at times. " negotiate differences between the parties"?!
Ain't nothin' to negotiate, the gun club is in the wrong, period full stop.
Maybe somebody will fire a few stray rounds UPRANGE and see how they like it.
Bah.
Gerard>
Everett, WA
Il colore del cielo, la forza del mare.
Sorry to be so dense, but you tend to write like a politician so it sometimes takes me a while to determine what the core position is behind your statements.
For the sake of this simple -minded solu, can I ask for a simple response to the following questions?
Do you agree that the homeowners have a legit complain and that it is the sole responsibility of the club to ensure
that bullets fired by their members stay within the boundaries of the range?
Do you,like Jamie appears to, believe that the developer acted unreasonably when he built the houses where he did?
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
"I don't know for sure but there is a large possibility that the developers did act irresponsibly or even criminally" [#136]
Well, the first clause is right. Didn't need the qualifier.
Do you want the calculation according to the Manges or the Pejsa model? And at what altitude, air temp and humidity?
Glen everything you wrote in your post about me, I could say about you, but I don't bother posting my thoughts. No reason, you'd deny it.The only difference is you use smileys with yours and they are useless. It's obvious what the intent is..
![]()
Yup really!
Phillip, do you really think that a gun club has the right to make property they don't own or pay taxes on unusuable and unsafe?
This is getting silly. I know that Phillip would never design or countenance a range where you used targets that cause potentially deadly ricochets three quarters of a mile or more off range, or even a foot off range, or a range designed without adequate backstop and traps. I can imagine Phillip being less conservation minded about the groundwater pollution and hazardous waste problems of a shooting range, but I just cannot fathom what appears here as a spirited defense of arrogant incompetence regarding firearms safety.