Link http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/7A650..._si_report.pdf to RN report.
I'm surprised that a £1bn submarine still relies on voicepipes to send messages from the bridge to the control room!
Nick
Link http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/7A650..._si_report.pdf to RN report.
I'm surprised that a £1bn submarine still relies on voicepipes to send messages from the bridge to the control room!
Nick
Isn't everything on such vessels electric, like steering and power, so verbal communication will do little good without power. I know, probably different circuits, but . . . .
You beat me to it Nick
Yeah so if everything else fails, the only thing to do for entertainment is exchange bad jokes between the control room and the bridge...
1 hr 38 min to rig the bridge for surface running?
I've read a few reports of these incidents over the years, and it's almost always the same finding: complacency, and/or a (perceived) need to keep to a schedule.
Tom
Main propulsion is steam turbine. There are both AC and DC supplies at anything from 24V up. However if fire or other failure shuts down the control electrics in the control room, why not provide a no working parts back up. It only needs one hull valve and back up hull valve. If it is easy to provide, why not have the insurance?
It really is quite difficult to build an ugly wooden boat.
Now for some new NEWS, if you are interested there is a nice embedded video here:
http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2012/0...ogress-update/
This is more meaty:
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/astute/
It really is quite difficult to build an ugly wooden boat.
I always wondered about the appropriateness of her name, given the situation she wound up in!![]()
Sounded like jet propulsion (electric?) with back up motor (electric?) driven backup retractible propellor. Mentions steering system but not the means, hydraulic? electric? nor the needed power for control. Interesting.