Cool, but it was posted here over a year ago!
with out any clearence- that's a 54 degree lean pretty impressive
So why was he sitting on the high side?
Really? If the bridge clearance is 65 feet and the mast height is 80 feet, then the cosine of the heel angle would be 65 / 80. This corresponds to a heel angle of about 36 degrees; the mast is 54 degrees above the horizontal. Still, a pretty impressive maneuver.
If the bags are full of water, then his setup is self-limiting. As the bags start to immerse, the pull on the halyard is reduced. This means he would be nearly unable to capsize unless he winches the bags WAY too high. I think he has done this trick before.
I think the reason he is sitting on the high side is twofold: He can see the masthead more easily and it is more comfortable
The weight of one person really doesn't make much difference when you are trying to heel that big a boat that far.
If someone had to do this sort of trick a lot, would it be worth putting a small video camera on the top of the mainmast? This would make it easier to judge clearance.
God bless!
Wayne
Currently sailing a Welsford designed Navigator at donumvitae.wordpress.com.
Sail on the outside, no wonder it's posted under "wimp''
Then there's this over on SA:
![]()
Cool pic in so many ways. Like the near bridge. And the waterball we can see is not at the masthead.
right you are teresajude! i souldn't be allowed to play with numbers. it always turns out sadly
Last edited by the_gr8t_waldo; 09-20-2011 at 03:47 PM.
Somewhere in Singapore
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
they must do it often.it looks like a port side extention is in place. to add buoyancy to the hull while in that position? that guy in the cock pit looks like he has the best seat in the house
It's likely that they have used the method numerous times transiting the ICW where there are quite a few bridges with 65' and lower clearance.
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”