Steve Hornsby
04-17-2005, 08:23 AM
Hi all,
I've managed to scarf, loft and stitch my Oarling together without any major disasters thus far (first boat). Looking good.
Question. As per the Devlin website, the beam of the Oarling is supposed to be 3ft 8in. Minus 1/2 inch outwales, I then take it to be 3ft 7in to the edges of the ply at the widest point (which I have found).
When attempting to get the correct beam, does one introduce rocker (I hope that is the right term) in the bottom by way of small blocks under the bow and stern? This way, the sides splay out with a nice consistent shape. Or, am I supposed to put in a spreader and let the bow and stern rise naturally. With the spreader only, the sides seem to flatten a bit at the quarters (my term for the section between the mid-point along sheer and bow/stern) - the shape is not as nice. It seems that the spreader has to work hard to pull up the bow and stern.
I would stick with the riser method (with a snug spreader placed for good measure) but now I am not sure how much rocker I should have. The plans do not show a measure for that. I have raised the bow and stern about 3 inchs each and achieved close to the correct beam - a spreader would take up the last 1/2 inch. The shape is nice. Does that sound like too much? Its hard to get a step-back view in my small shop.
Any Oarling/Dory builders wish to comment? Is there a standard for the Gull/Light Dory?
Thanks in advance.
Steve (hopefully rowing soon) Hornsby
I've managed to scarf, loft and stitch my Oarling together without any major disasters thus far (first boat). Looking good.
Question. As per the Devlin website, the beam of the Oarling is supposed to be 3ft 8in. Minus 1/2 inch outwales, I then take it to be 3ft 7in to the edges of the ply at the widest point (which I have found).
When attempting to get the correct beam, does one introduce rocker (I hope that is the right term) in the bottom by way of small blocks under the bow and stern? This way, the sides splay out with a nice consistent shape. Or, am I supposed to put in a spreader and let the bow and stern rise naturally. With the spreader only, the sides seem to flatten a bit at the quarters (my term for the section between the mid-point along sheer and bow/stern) - the shape is not as nice. It seems that the spreader has to work hard to pull up the bow and stern.
I would stick with the riser method (with a snug spreader placed for good measure) but now I am not sure how much rocker I should have. The plans do not show a measure for that. I have raised the bow and stern about 3 inchs each and achieved close to the correct beam - a spreader would take up the last 1/2 inch. The shape is nice. Does that sound like too much? Its hard to get a step-back view in my small shop.
Any Oarling/Dory builders wish to comment? Is there a standard for the Gull/Light Dory?
Thanks in advance.
Steve (hopefully rowing soon) Hornsby