PDA

View Full Version : A Gay Bomb?



Norman Bernstein
06-12-2007, 08:50 AM
This is either
1) the funniest news story I've seen all year,
2) the stupidest news story I've seen all year, or
3) the most disturbing news story I've seen all year!

Cast your own vote!




Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'

http://llnw.img.viacomlocalnetworks.com/images_sizedimage_097151318/sm Hank Plante (http://cbs5.com/bios/local_bio_287155916.html)
Reporting

(CBS 5) BERKELEY A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.

Gay community leaders in California said Friday that they found the notion of a "gay bomb" both offensive and almost laughable at the same time.

"Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction," said Geoff Kors of Equality California. "So, it's just offensive that they think by turning people gay that the other military would be incapable of doing their job. And its absurd because there's so much medical data that shows that sexual orientation is immutable and cannot be changed."

Milo Christensen
06-12-2007, 09:12 AM
Clinton appointees?

JimD
06-12-2007, 09:18 AM
My sympathy to the casualties of friendly fire.

WillW
06-12-2007, 09:29 AM
Tell it to the Spartans.

brad9798
06-12-2007, 09:30 AM
Where is Agent 86?

Like something out of Get Smart! Oh wait ... that was the NUDE bomb.

Yes, Jim, it brings a new meaning to friendly fire! :D

Norman Bernstein
06-12-2007, 09:38 AM
Clinton appointees?

Of course! Clinton's responsible for ALL the evil in government.... everything going on in the past 6 years under Bush.... and he's probably responsible for for everything in the dozen or so years preceeding him. He causes bad breath and body odor, as well.... damn that guy.

Sheeeesh. And I get lambasted for being a so-called 'Bush hater'? :)

Milo Christensen
06-12-2007, 10:14 AM
It involved nonconsensual homosexual sex and it happened on Clinton's watch. He's obviously guilty of gross abuse of the feelings of his base.

Art Read
06-12-2007, 10:22 AM
If this would work, why not just send women over the trenches. Think of all those straight, male soldiers on the other side dropping their rifles and their pants left, right and center! I smell a skunk.

Bruce Hooke
06-12-2007, 10:28 AM
I'd chalk it up to funniest story...keep in mind that the idea starts with "strong aphrodisiacs," so nowhere in this whole concept is there an assumption that just making someone gay could make them incapable of fighting. The idea that there exists a chemical that is such a strong aphrodisiac that it would render people incapable of fighting is a bit beyond belief! After all, haven't humans been searching for strong aphrodisiacs pretty much since the dawn of time? Furthermore, most of our soldiers already come from the age range where young men are thinking about sex all the time anyway, and it does not seem to have hampered their ability to fight.

If we could come up with a chemical that would cause people to make love not war, I can't say that I'd see it as that horrific a weapon!

Mrleft8
06-12-2007, 10:33 AM
Well, what we need now is a bomb that makes goats irresistibly attractive to insurgents. ;)
I think that's sort of redundant....Don't you?
:D

LeeG
06-12-2007, 11:03 AM
seems to me that young soldiers are thinking of sex all the time anyway, what's the diff?

Yeadon
06-12-2007, 12:32 PM
The Gay Bomb was obviously produced by DoD "brilliance."

However, my all-time favorite non-lethal military weapon ... the sonic bowel gun.

I thought I saw an article on this a year or two ago, but can't seem to find it now. It claimed that a low frequency harmonic could be blasted at opposing soldiers, forcing the sudden liquification of their bowels.

Michael s/v Sannyasin
06-12-2007, 12:42 PM
They tested the sonic bowel thing on Myth-Busters recently. They couldn't get a frequency that would work.

They do have some sort of heat gun (probably microwave) that appears to be pretty effective from the tests they've conducted.

ccmanuals
06-12-2007, 12:49 PM
It involved nonconsensual homosexual sex and it happened on Clinton's watch. He's obviously guilty of gross abuse of the feelings of his base.

You must be kidding Milo. Sure you are. Every one knows that Air Force Lab workers are not political appointees.

Bob Cleek
06-12-2007, 02:28 PM
I think they must have tested it over San Francisco. Fortunately, some of us were immune! Too few... too few. I doubt such a chemical agent would ever be an effective weapon, though. Somebody shooting at you tends to have an adverse effect on your sexual urges. If it worked at all, it would probably not be because it made the enemy horney, but because it turned them all into a bunch of bitchy queens having the mother of all hissy fits!

Nicholas Scheuer
06-12-2007, 02:45 PM
Who says history doesn't repeat itself?

Moby Nick

huisjen
06-12-2007, 03:23 PM
If they think they could make the delivery system work, why "a strong aphrodisiac"? Why not use something simple, like something that gives a bad case of the munchies/giggling fits?

The next question is, if this idea is so obviously unworkable, what's it's budget really being spent on?

Dan

stevebaby
06-12-2007, 03:47 PM
I think that's sort of redundant....Don't you?
:DUS Special Forces...staring at goats!

http://www.jonronson.com/goats_04.html
the men who stare at goats | jonronson.com

skuthorp
06-13-2007, 03:12 AM
Sounds like a nice safe EXPENSIVE research project to siphon off defence funds to a favoured lobby group. But I hope that it's just a hoax that's been taken too seriously. In fact it sounds like satire, but the military have never done that well have they?

Garrett Lowell
06-17-2007, 02:33 PM
This is either
1) the funniest news story I've seen all year,
2) the stupidest news story I've seen all year, or
3) the most disturbing news story I've seen all year!

Cast your own vote!

You forgot number 4) the least newsworthy and biggest waste of time I've seen all year

Nicholas Carey
06-17-2007, 03:00 PM
If they think they could make the delivery system work, why "a strong aphrodisiac"? Why not use something simple, like something that gives a bad case of the munchies/giggling fits?Hash brownies?:p