PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba



Tylerdurden
05-27-2007, 05:29 AM
By David Ruppe
N E W Y O R K, May 1, 2001
Font Size
http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/font-sm_off.gif (javascript:void(0);) http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/font-md_on.gif (javascript:void(0);) http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/font-lg_off.gif (javascript:void(0);)
http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/icons/icon-email.gif E-mail (http://app.abcnews.go.com/sendtofriend/SendToFriend?id=92662)
http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/icons/icon-print.gif Print (http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=92662)
In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
adsonar_placementId=1280488;adsonar_pid=43749;adso nar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=165;adsonar_zh=220;adsonar_jv='ads.ad sonar.com';
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.
America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."
Details of the plans are described in Body of Secrets (Doubleday), a new book by investigative reporter James Bamford about the history of America's largest spy agency, the National Security Agency. However, the plans were not connected to the agency, he notes.
The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.
"These were Joint Chiefs of Staff documents. The reason these were held secret for so long is the Joint Chiefs never wanted to give these up because they were so embarrassing," Bamford told ABCNEWS.com.
"The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want but that nobody else wants."
Gunning for War
The documents show "the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government," writes Bamford.


continued...................
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662

Tylerdurden
05-27-2007, 05:37 AM
Though I have been talking about the Northwoods documents for several years, many claimed it a hoax except the proof of the documents to the National Archives has been proven several times.
If a document and plan of this degree can land on a presidents desk in the 1960's how hard is it to see that PNAC's call for a new Pearl Harbor by the presidents top policy makers would result in the history of the past 10 years.

Nothing to see hear, move along. Get off the streets!

S.V. Airlie
05-27-2007, 06:35 AM
Read the "Crisis Years 1960-63."... About Kennedy's administration.
This is old news....

Tylerdurden
05-27-2007, 11:04 AM
Read the "Crisis Years 1960-63."... About Kennedy's administration.
This is old news....

Maybe so, but so many don't get it. Both Gravel and Paul have made remarks about curtailing the military industrial complex and the letter agencys but they are fringe candidates for that very reason.
I say if you have read the Northwoods documents and think it is no big deal then you support terrorism.
If you have an argument against that statement I would love to hear it. But please don't tell me its okay if we do it.