Hell no,we won't go back to Iraq

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seanz
    Resilient?
    • Nov 2006
    • 23662

    Hell no,we won't go back to Iraq

    Found this on the local news website.This will be a major PITA for the Howard government.
    "Go home you naughty diplomats"
    "No it's not safe ,there's a war on you know"
    "But you're in the Army"
    "That's how we know it's not safe"
    "But we're winning"
    "We're in the Army.If we were winning we would know"
    And so on and so forth
    Hilarious








    3 Iraqi diplomats seek asylum in Australia

    The Associated Press
    Wednesday, February 7, 2007
    CANBERRA, Australia Three Iraqi diplomats and their families are seeking asylum in Australia after their government ordered them back to their embattled country, the government said Thursday.
    The three lost their diplomatic accreditation after Iraq closed the office of the military attache within the Iraqi embassy in the national capital Canberra on Dec. 15, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, or DFAT, said in a statement.
    They are former chief defense attache Brig. Gen. Sabah Al-Kareen Zebon Fureje and his staffers Kamal J. Askander and Ala' Al-Amiri, The Australian national newspaper reported. DFAT declined to confirm their names, citing privacy laws.
    "We understand that these officials and their dependents have applied through normal channels for visas to remain in Australia," the statement said.
    "Their applications will be processed by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship on their individual merits and in accordance with Australian law," it added. DFAT can consider rare applications for political asylum.
    The Immigration Department declined to comment, citing privacy laws.
    Neither department would say whether the families had been placed in immigration detention while their applications are assessed.
    The Iraq embassy refused to make any official comment.
    But an embassy official said he did not know where the three former diplomats now were.
    He said military attaches were being closed at Iraqi embassies around the world "because of Defense Department financial concerns."
    The embassy was closed in 2003 when the former ambassador was expelled on the eve of Australia sending 2,000 troops to support the U.S. and British militaries in the Iraq invasion. The embassy reopened in 2004.
    The asylum claims are a potential political test for Prime Minister John Howard who maintains that democracy can survive in Iraq despite the current violence.
    Almost all Iraqi asylum claims were accepted by Australia when former dictator Saddam Hussein was in power.
    DFAT places Iraq in its most dangerous category of travel destinations and advises Australian travelers not to go there.
    "We strongly advise you not to travel to Iraq because of the extremely dangerous security situation and very high threat of terrorist attack," DFAT's Web site says in its latest travel advisory.
    Australia granted Chinese diplomat Chen Yonglin asylum in June 2005, a month after he abandoned his Sydney post despite protests from Beijing that he did not face persecution.
    Last edited by seanz; 02-08-2007, 01:24 AM.
    We don't know how lucky we are....
  • Andrew Craig-Bennett
    Who?
    • Aug 1999
    • 28502

    #2
    Priceless!

    Britain is in an interesting position, too.

    A Somali who claimed refugee status on his arrival, then raped a child, served (half of) a five year jail sentence, but was not deported at the end of it because the Home Office "could not guarantee his safety in Somalia". He raped another child and is now jailed for life - at the British taxpayer's considerable expense.

    Yet Britain issues almost no visas of any kind to Iraqis - clearly for fear that any Iraqi who gets here will immediately claim asylum.
    IMAGINES VEL NON FUERINT

    Comment

    • Milo Christensen
      Banned
      • May 2006
      • 6578

      #3
      The U.S. is doing a despicable job of admitting Iraqi refugees. About 200 last year, vs Australia's 2,000.

      I guess if the Bush administration accepted more of the Iraqi refugees then they would be seen as failing to provide security in Iraq.

      202 Iraqis given refugee status out of 70,000 slots available yearly. Despicable.

      Comment

      • Andrew Craig-Bennett
        Who?
        • Aug 1999
        • 28502

        #4
        Its very difficult to find the British numbers, (odd, that.. ) but they will be similar. After all, Blair was actually deporting Iraqis back to Kurdistan in the run up to the invasion.
        IMAGINES VEL NON FUERINT

        Comment

        • LeeG
          Senior Member
          • May 2002
          • 73012

          #5
          Originally posted by Milo Christensen
          The U.S. is doing a despicable job of admitting Iraqi refugees. About 200 last year, vs Australia's 2,000.

          I guess if the Bush administration accepted more of the Iraqi refugees then they would be seen as failing to provide security in Iraq.

          202 Iraqis given refugee status out of 70,000 slots available yearly. Despicable.
          holy crap, I was wondering about that. Shouldn't that option be available to some Iraqis given the Vietnam experience?

          Comment

          • John of Phoenix
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2001
            • 31214

            #6
            He said military attaches were being closed at Iraqi embassies around the world "because of Defense Department financial concerns."
            Financial concerns? The US sent 363 tons, that's right TONS, of $100 bills to Iraq and they claim they're out of money?

            Comment

            • LeeG
              Senior Member
              • May 2002
              • 73012

              #7
              yes the money was sent,,doesn't mean they have any left. Rumsfelds UU's (unknownunknowns) created many little blackholes that could suck up rolls, bricks and loose bills of any denomination.

              PhaseIV and oversight is for unbelievers too timid to act on future historians intel,,AKA the 1%Doctrine.

              Comment

              Working...