PDA

View Full Version : A speech never made... (Inspiring , yet creepy)



Art Read
12-08-2003, 07:14 PM
On July 10, 1999— When man first landed on the moon 30 years ago, President Nixon had a speech all ready in case man could not get off again.



A contingency statement was prepared for Nixon, an eerie, poignant tribute that he would deliver while the astronauts were still alive but when there was no longer any hope for them.
“Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace,” says the statement, incorporated in a memo entitled “In Event of Moon Disaster.”

‘Widows-to-Be’
The memo is dated July 18, 1969, two days before the moon landing.
Nixon never had to act on it. Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin made it safely off the moon, back into the command module with Michael Collins, and home. The words were drafted by William Safire, then a Nixon speechwriter and now a columnist for The New York Times.
The memo ended up in the National Archives and was reported this week by the Los Angeles Times.
According to the memo, in the event of disaster Nixon was advised to call each of the “widows-to-be” before reading the statement to the nation.
Then NASA would cut off communication with the stranded astronauts and a clergyman would “adopt the same procedure as a burial at sea, commending their souls to ‘the deepest of the deep,’ concluding with the Lord’s Prayer.”
It has long been rumored that astronauts landing on the moon carried suicide capsules in case their return became impossible.
The Apollo XI astronauts spent more than 21 hours on the moon, watched by millions around the world on TV. Nixon had the happy duty of putting in a phone call to them while they stood on the dusty lunar surface.

‘Epic Men’
But had something gone terribly wrong, these words were prepared:
“Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace.
“These brave men, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, know that there is no hope for their recovery. But they also know that there is hope for mankind in their sacrifice.
“These two men are laying down their lives in mankind’s most noble goal: the search for truth and understanding.
“They will be mourned by their families and friends; they will be mourned by their nation; they will be mourned by the people of the world; they will be mourned by a Mother Earth that dared send two of her sons into the unknown.
“In their exploration, they stirred the people of the world to feel as one; in their sacrifice, they bind more tightly the brotherhood of man.
“In ancient days, men looked at stars and saw their heroes in the constellations. In modern times, we do much the same, but our heroes are epic men of flesh and blood.
“Others will follow, and surely find their way home. Man’s search will not be denied. But these men were the first, and they will remain the foremost in our hearts.
“For every human being who looks up at the moon in the nights to come will know that there is some corner of another world that is forever mankind.”

[ 12-09-2003, 01:22 AM: Message edited by: Art Read ]

NormMessinger
12-08-2003, 09:12 PM
Shivers!

Andrew Craig-Bennett
12-08-2003, 10:25 PM
I disagree.

I think the really creepy bit is that the speech was prepared in advance; that Nixon could not be trusted to act normal even in such a case.

Art Read
12-08-2003, 10:50 PM
That's beneath you, Andrew... Supose Churchill's "....Never have so few given so much to so many..." speech was written "in advance"?

Would it be less stirring?

[ 12-09-2003, 12:37 AM: Message edited by: Art Read ]

L.W. Baxter
12-08-2003, 10:50 PM
Oh dear, Art. Don't go there. Churchill wrote all his own stuff.

L.W. Baxter
12-08-2003, 10:52 PM
Please don't start an argumant about the relative merits of Richard Nixon and Winston friggin' Churchill. We can't win that one, Art.

Andrew Craig-Bennett
12-08-2003, 10:55 PM
Art, it was'nt, in the sense that it was not written for him before the Battle of Britain, so that he could read it out in the event of the RAF winning. He wrote all his speeches himself; yes he rehearsed them, as he himself made clear, but he wrote them very shortly before they were delivered.

To have a speech ready prepared, written by someone else, for use in the event of a mishap, is creepy. It shows how "presentation" has come to take the place of substance.

When the second NASA accident did happen, President Reagan gave a very good speech, and I would hate to think he had it prepared in advance.

Art Read
12-08-2003, 10:56 PM
I was hardly comparing Churchill and Nixon... Who could!?! But their words stand. Would it be less stirring if Sir Winston had a ghost writer and "Tricky Dick" hadn't?

[ 12-09-2003, 12:13 AM: Message edited by: Art Read ]

Art Read
12-08-2003, 11:07 PM
Of COURSE Reagan had a speach writer for the Challenger tragedy. A famous French pilot/poet for one...

The bottom line is was that he said the words that we, as a people, a nation and an "idea", really needed to hear at that moment. Churchill, Reagan, Roosevelt, Paine and Nelson have done the same in their own times...

[ 12-09-2003, 12:08 AM: Message edited by: Art Read ]

Andrew Craig-Bennett
12-08-2003, 11:08 PM
I find the idea of Winston Churchill employing a speech writer rather difficult to imagine; it would no more have occurred to him to do that than to employ ghost writers on his books.

Do you happen to know, a propos Nixon, if the speech that produced "the greatest comeback since Lazarus" was scripted? I have always assumed that it was not.

It's not so much that Safire wrote it for Nixon to say, it's that he, or his minders, had the speech commissioned "just in case".

L.W. Baxter
12-08-2003, 11:11 PM
The idea of two men stranded on the moon, looking out across the black void at the blue-green globe...

When would you take the suicide pill?

Art Read
12-08-2003, 11:18 PM
Good question... And my only inspiration for posting this. We all think how "cool" it would have been to have been able to have done that... And we all forget the real possibilities.

To answer your specific question.... Perhaps not until my air supply ran out... Perhaps just after "Mission Control" signed off that last time...

[ 12-09-2003, 12:23 AM: Message edited by: Art Read ]

Andrew Craig-Bennett
12-08-2003, 11:25 PM
The boast of heraldry, the pomp of power
And all that beauty, all that wealth, e'er gave
Await alike th'inevitable hour
The paths of glory lead but to the grave.

One day, we will each of us stand before our deaths; we may have a long time to contemplate the unavoidable, or we may have a couple of seconds, but to each of us this thing will surely come.

I would like to think that I would spend some of the time preparing my soul to meet its Maker. In that respect, being cut off from all humanity, as will happen to all of us, would not matter, because I would be thinking about God, not Man, and the magnificent view that the astronauts enjoyed might assist in composing one's thoughts.

We won't have the same view, though.

[ 12-09-2003, 12:30 AM: Message edited by: Andrew Craig-Bennett ]

Art Read
12-08-2003, 11:44 PM
And WHAT a view it was, eh?

L.W. Baxter
12-09-2003, 12:01 AM
I saw a program on FOX a while back, the premise of which was that man has never been to the moon. They had all kinds of "experts" on with all kinds of "evidence" that the whole thing was fabricated in the Nevada desert. And the only voice of dissent against this flood of ridiculousness was some low-level staffer who might, at one point, have swept floors for NASA.

Anyway, it would seem that a speech, prepared for the President of the United States for a disastrous contingency, might serve as proof to the skeptic. Along with a few other things, of course. But then, the shows' producers were not interested in refuting any of their "evidence."

With so many people treating TV as their principal source of information and education, this kind of thing is really scary.

Sad to think of all the weak-minded people who must go around thinking that the world and our human possibilities are so small. Thanks alot, FOX Network!

I predict that at some point we will see arguments in the mainstream "press" that the Nazi Holocaust never happened.

That's when I'll be taking my suicide pill!

Art Read
12-09-2003, 12:28 AM
BTW... These people had six different protocals for how the astronauts might have BOWEL MOVEMENTS! You find it "unusual" that their President had a "worst case scenario" message planned out? This was all done on live, worldwide television. Live. I remember watching it as a six year old. And I remember, even then, wondering "what if?" What were YOU doing?

Oyvind Snibsoer
12-09-2003, 02:53 AM
I wuz two years old, probably busy filling my diapers or something :D

Considering that Churchill was a master of words, and the 1953 Nobel Laureate in Literature "for his mastery of historical and biographical description as well as for brilliant oratory in defending exalted human values", I doubt that any speech writer could have done it better than him.

Ken Hall
12-09-2003, 10:43 AM
Speechwriter question aside, having something like this in advance isn't unusual. Eisenhower had a statement ready for the event of failure on D-Day.

Andrew Craig-Bennett
12-09-2003, 11:04 AM
I think I should admit my mistake, and proffer apologies to the shade of Richard Milhous Nixon.

Sorry. I was out of line.