PDA

View Full Version : Progress in Bush's Hell Hole.....may be 5 less than...



Norske3
12-31-2005, 08:02 AM
......last year.Time for another "Victory Landing".......wonder if the Forum is being downloaded to US Gov computers. :eek:
web page (http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-12-31-iraq-toll-rdp_x.htm?csp=24)

[ 12-31-2005, 09:06 AM: Message edited by: Norske3 ]

LeeG
12-31-2005, 08:09 AM
Freedom isn't Free,,it cost 3Billion/wk.

2005 Iraq in review (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article334915.ece)

ssor
12-31-2005, 08:09 AM
A true sign of insanity is: continuing a failed effort endlessly in hope of a different result. :rolleyes:

Norske3
12-31-2005, 08:21 AM
OH.... :( ... what good 3 BILLION could do for the starving kids in the hills and cities of this country....for the smart poor kids deserving of education assistance....for the homeless everywhere...New Orleans...Florida....on and on...THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE IN IRAQ.....SO THERE WILL NEVER BE DEMOCRACY IN IRAQ.

LeeG
12-31-2005, 08:29 AM
actually Norske it's what $3Billion a week could do for the arms industry back home. Filling gas tanks and replacing boots and belts doesn't get lobbiests excited like new weapon systems.

High C
12-31-2005, 08:46 AM
Originally posted by LeeG:
Freedom isn't Free...And don't you forget it.

ljb5
12-31-2005, 09:07 AM
Originally posted by LeeG:
Freedom isn't free......but war sure can be profitable!

Norske3
12-31-2005, 09:07 AM
And our freedom was never threaten by the simple fact that if Saddam had WMD he DIDN"T HAVE THE THE DELIVERY SYSTEM.....bullets without guns are... :rolleyes:

High C
12-31-2005, 09:48 AM
Originally posted by Norske3:
And our freedom was never threaten by the simple fact that if Saddam had WMD he DIDN"T HAVE THE THE DELIVERY SYSTEM.....bullets without guns are... :rolleyes: Hey, the Chinese managed to acquire the delivery system, pretty cheaply, too...

jack grebe
12-31-2005, 09:54 AM
if terrorist can bring down the WTC with a couple of box cutters, I am sure damsad could figger out how to deliver WMD

LeeG
12-31-2005, 10:08 AM
High,High,High,

the Chinese have delivery systems,,we don't give them delivery systems. Be specific. Or is this like "saddam had wmd" and the "wmd" is scrap metal rocket engines?

High C
12-31-2005, 05:10 PM
Originally posted by LeeG:
...Be specific....Guidance. But you already know that....

ssor
12-31-2005, 05:40 PM
Originally posted by jack grebe:
if terrorist can bring down the WTC with a couple of box cutters, I am sure damsad could figger out how to deliver WMDFEDEX?

jack grebe
12-31-2005, 08:35 PM
naaa maybe UPS :D

Meerkat
12-31-2005, 08:38 PM
Originally posted by High C:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Norske3:
And our freedom was never threaten by the simple fact that if Saddam had WMD he DIDN"T HAVE THE THE DELIVERY SYSTEM.....bullets without guns are... :rolleyes: Hey, the Chinese managed to acquire the delivery system, pretty cheaply, too...</font>[/QUOTE]A rip fairytale! tongue.gif

Meerkat
12-31-2005, 08:39 PM
Originally posted by High C:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by LeeG:
...Be specific....Guidance. But you already know that....</font>[/QUOTE]More rip fairy tale. tongue.gif

High C
12-31-2005, 10:08 PM
History revisionism at its most blatant.... :rolleyes:

You ain't fooling nobody...

Wild Wassa
12-31-2005, 10:13 PM
Or? ... you ain't fooling those who have already been fooled.

Warren.

Meerkat
01-01-2006, 01:19 AM
Originally posted by High C:
History revisionism at its most blatant.... :rolleyes:

You ain't fooling nobody...Believe what you want to. What's one more myth? tongue.gif

BrianW
01-01-2006, 02:44 AM
Originally posted by ssor:
A true sign of insanity is: continuing a failed effort endlessly in hope of a different result. :rolleyes: You may have a point! That is, as it applies to voting either for a Republican, or a Democrat.

Can we say "third party choice?" smile.gif

George Jung
01-01-2006, 10:47 AM
Sorry, Brian; but when you're talking to 'true believers' - on either side of the fence - a 'third', or middle choice doesn't exist! :D

Peter Malcolm Jardine
01-01-2006, 05:17 PM
History revisionism at its most blatant.. The only history you could intelligently converse about is what you had for breakfast. :rolleyes: