PDA

View Full Version : Closer to Perjury



Ian McColgin
09-05-2018, 06:39 PM
[IMc - No wonder the Republicans are so anxious to slam this through while they are still able to with hold the evidence. We are not yet at the point where Kavanaugh can be charged with perjury, but we are at the point where Kavanaugh's veracity desperately needs corroboration.

Published on Wednesday, September 05, 2018, by Common Dreams

After Explosive Grilling by Sen. Leahy, Democrats Urged to Read Kavanaugh "Committee Confidential" Files Into Public Record
"Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."

by Jon Queally, staff writer

"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."

As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :

Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.

Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.

Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.

In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups—namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America—jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.

In a statement, the groups declared:

Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy’s questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared “Committee Confidential” include emails that are highly relevant––and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh’s knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.

Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents “Committee Confidential” or prohibit their public release.

If there are relevant records on this issue––or any other issue that requires public release–– they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.

In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Tom from Rubicon
09-05-2018, 06:55 PM
NPR said questions had failed to strike the jugular. What I heard at 2:30 pm today. If Ian's post is correct the jugular was struck. Tomorrow is waiting.
Tom

Ian McColgin
09-05-2018, 07:09 PM
From the article, I do not think the jugular has been struck. It's possible that a minor artery has been nicked.

WI-Tom
09-05-2018, 11:55 PM
Wait--are any of you people still thinking Republicans care about ethics, morality, the rule of law, or an independent judiciary? Wake up!

Tom

Durnik
09-06-2018, 12:02 AM
"The problem with the progressives and liberals right now is that they are still treating this situation like we are in a state of normalcy."