PDA

View Full Version : Hey Geng, You Hear the Latest on Hillary?



Cuyahoga Chuck
09-13-2016, 10:35 PM
Well, Here it is!

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/opinion/campaign-stops/did-you-hear-the-latest-about-hillary.html

Right from the "Lamestream" media. You don't even have to skulk around on breitbart and those other swillish sites.
Remember, I had to pop $2.50 at Heinens to get these goodies. You're getting them for nothing.

Vince Brennan
09-13-2016, 10:37 PM
Bet he got one sentence into it.

David G
09-13-2016, 11:24 PM
Doesn't matter how far. Availability is one thing. Comprehension is quite another.

Jim Bow
09-13-2016, 11:43 PM
Giuliani wants folks to get their info from the internet. (https://www.quora.com/Is-Rudy-Giuliani-a-closeted-trans-woman)

Vince Brennan
09-14-2016, 06:43 AM
Genglandoh < Comprehension

Except when it's defamatory or denigrative toward Hillary.

Hwyl
09-14-2016, 07:16 AM
Oooh an attack thread

Daniel Noyes
09-14-2016, 07:23 AM
What we all want to read is the exciting transcript of Loreta Lynches airport meeting with Bill where she discussed their Grand Children and did not say anything to Bill about Hillary's legal issues ;)

Norman Bernstein
09-14-2016, 07:28 AM
What we all want to read is the exciting transcript of Loreta Lynches airport meeting with Bill where she discussed their Grand Children and did not say anything to Bill about Hillary's legal issues ;)

I'd like to read it too. Evidently, you don't need to read it, because you apparently know all there is to know about the conversation, right?

Is it necessary to actually wear the tinfoil hat, to be that clairvoyant?

jack grebe
09-14-2016, 07:56 AM
Oooh an attack thread

Agreed

David G
09-14-2016, 06:22 PM
I'd like to read it too. Evidently, you don't need to read it, because you apparently know all there is to know about the conversation, right?

Is it necessary to actually wear the tinfoil hat, to be that clairvoyant?

Facts? We don't NEED no stinkeeng facts!!!!

David G
09-15-2016, 10:42 AM
Here's the real problem. AND SHE EVEN ADMITS IT!!!!!

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14292273_10154611197614917_6594910016352804852_n.j pg?oh=edbeabee5466c5a7e5160260acd3f4e4&oe=586EBFC0

ccmanuals
09-15-2016, 11:31 AM
What we all want to read is the exciting transcript of Loreta Lynches airport meeting with Bill where she discussed their Grand Children and did not say anything to Bill about Hillary's legal issues ;)

You're funny. Two people in a chance meeting on a airport tarmac always have someone taking notes of their conversation.

biga
09-15-2016, 12:37 PM
You're funny. Two people in a chance meeting on a airport tarmac always have someone taking notes of their conversation.



CHANCE MEETING?!?!?!?!? hhhaahahahahahhaa

leikec
09-15-2016, 12:44 PM
Here's the real problem. AND SHE EVEN ADMITS IT!!!!!

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14292273_10154611197614917_6594910016352804852_n.j pg?oh=edbeabee5466c5a7e5160260acd3f4e4&oe=586EBFC0

Exactly.

Jeff C

ccmanuals
09-15-2016, 01:51 PM
CHANCE MEETING?!?!?!?!? hhhaahahahahahhaa

Right, because it's a common practice to schedule meetings on airplane tarmacs. You're a funny guy.

biga
09-15-2016, 02:22 PM
Right, because it's a common practice to schedule meetings on airplane tarmacs. You're a funny guy.

if you're a slimy politician, then yes... that crap is common practice. if the meeting were on the up and up, it would have occurred in someone's office and NOT on a tarmac.

Joe (SoCal)
09-15-2016, 02:30 PM
if you're a slimy politician, then yes... that crap is common practice. if the meeting were on the up and up, it would have occurred in someone's office and NOT on a tarmac.

In the end didn't matter 538 still has her pegged to be the next POTUS by a large margin :D

Gerarddm
09-15-2016, 02:33 PM
I see biga's comment in Joe's post, and actually, it is the opposite: if you wanted a clandestine meeting, you wouldn't hold it in the open. Jeesh. No, wait, excuse me: duh.