PDA

View Full Version : Can Hillary be trusted with National Security information?



genglandoh
07-06-2016, 06:40 AM
It is clear that Hillary made some major mistakes in handling Nation Security Information when she was SOS.
I do not think we should trust her in the future with National Security Information.

Kevin T
07-06-2016, 06:51 AM
Why, do you believe she's a foreign agent? Why, do you believe she intrinsically hates the United States? Why, do you believe Trump would put the interests of the United States ahead of his own business interests?

SMARTINSEN
07-06-2016, 07:01 AM
Good thing her opponent is a careful, deliberate, and well trusted.

skuthorp
07-06-2016, 07:19 AM
Got an alternative KMac? The GOP doesn't.

Hoist on your own petard.

skuthorp
07-06-2016, 07:27 AM
Donald is an independent, he just blindsided and made use of the GOP label, when it suited.

One thing Trump said I agree with. The system is rigged. Deliberately so and likely from the start. That delegate thing that binds registered voters…………..

ljb5
07-06-2016, 09:39 AM
Mistakes were made. It happens.

Such is life.

Get over it.

Hwyl
07-06-2016, 09:44 AM
The state department server was hacked. Hillary did the country a favor by supplying her own private server.

genglandoh
09-01-2016, 09:20 AM
Even after she was no longer SOS she continued to email classified information.

Title: Clinton emailed classified information after leaving State Dept.
Hillary Clinton continued sending classified information even after leaving the State Department, The Post has exclusively learned.
On May 28, 2013, months after stepping down as secretary of state, Clinton sent an email to a group of diplomats and top aides about the “123 Deal” with the United Arab Emirates.
Link: http://nypost.com/2016/08/31/clinton-emailed-classified-information-after-leaving-state-dept/

ahp
09-01-2016, 11:00 AM
Yes

David G
09-01-2016, 11:03 AM
fart

Ian McColgin
09-01-2016, 11:11 AM
Did the numbdidies on the right read the FBI report where they said that there was no evidence of anyone hacking her server. So far the only wikileaks on this have been let out by sloppy security in Congress.

genglandoh
10-31-2016, 03:26 PM
With what we know not it is clear Hillary can not be trusted with National Security informations.

1. She used a private email server for ALL of her government business.
2. She claimed none of the email were about clarified information - false.
3. She claimed she did not know the material was classified - basically claiming she is stupid.
4. She claimed she did not know the (c) indicated classified material - basically claiming she is stupid.
5. This weekend emails are found on a sex pervert computer.

How can a person who has been in Government of year be so reckless with classified material.

TomF
10-31-2016, 03:38 PM
Sweet Jesus, geng. Check your groundwater.

Dan McCosh
10-31-2016, 03:42 PM
Trump shared an attorney with John Gotti for much of his business career--how secure is that?

Cuyahoga Chuck
10-31-2016, 05:11 PM
It is clear that Hillary made some major mistakes in handling Nation Security Information when she was SOS.
I do not think we should trust her in the future with National Security Information.

Classified information is doled out based on a "need to know ". Hillary as secretary of state knew a lot but not everything. When she becomes president she will be fed even more so she might become the most highly informed president we have had yet.
You may as well learn to live with it now. If you go on feeding yourself all those breitbart fantasies your going to crack up.

Paul Girouard
10-31-2016, 05:54 PM
No , if she where a low ranking Petty Officer with a secret or better security clearance she'd have, at minimum, had her security clearance pulled , or if she where a E-6 or above: Bbeen charged with dereliction of duty , busted in pay grade , fined , served some type of restriction , or possibly more chargers brought under the UCMJ.

ccmanuals
10-31-2016, 08:06 PM
No , if she where a low ranking Petty Officer with a secret or better security clearance she'd have, at minimum, had her security clearance pulled , or if she where a E-6 or above: Bbeen charged with dereliction of duty , busted in pay grade , fined , served some type of restriction , or possibly more chargers brought under the UCMJ.

Probably none of those things.

If it was not intentional none of those things happen.

I managed Dod classified email systems for over 25 years so I have a little bit of first hand knowledge in this area.

Hugh Conway
10-31-2016, 08:17 PM
it's a good thing donald trump's company's have never deleted emails or destroyed evidence < sarcasm / >

Waddie
10-31-2016, 08:56 PM
No , if she where a low ranking Petty Officer with a secret or better security clearance she'd have, at minimum, had her security clearance pulled , or if she where a E-6 or above: Bbeen charged with dereliction of duty , busted in pay grade , fined , served some type of restriction , or possibly more chargers brought under the UCMJ.

exactly. +1. Same if she was a run of the mill bureaucrat.

David G
10-31-2016, 10:05 PM
And logic. LOGIC would be swell.

https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14915550_977830059011042_7838395522741148591_n.jpg ?oh=2c88d4e275d7aeb9754a734d3138f696&oe=58D33497

bobbys
10-31-2016, 10:28 PM
No , if she where a low ranking Petty Officer with a secret or better security clearance she'd have, at minimum, had her security clearance pulled , or if she where a E-6 or above: Bbeen charged with dereliction of duty , busted in pay grade , fined , served some type of restriction , or possibly more chargers brought under the UCMJ.
.

My dad was a 2d class carpenters mate in the seabees / marines in wW2 .

He would not tell me secret stuff from the pacific..

He finnaly admitted they had Navajo code talkers though.

paulf
11-01-2016, 01:27 AM
Probably none of those things.

If it was not intentional none of those things happen.

I managed Dod classified email systems for over 25 years so I have a little bit of first hand knowledge in this area.

Agreed and seconded.

bobbys
11-01-2016, 01:47 AM
it's a good thing donald trump's company's have never deleted emails or destroyed evidence < sarcasm / >
.

What National secrets or sensitive govermeant info do DTs hotels have to delete ?..