View Full Version : Soliciting votes for Ron Paul

Ian McColgin
08-29-2014, 07:07 AM
Washington Post

Former Iowa state senator pleads guilty in Ron Paul endorsement-for-pay scheme

By Matea Gold August 27

A former Iowa state senator pleaded guilty Wednesday to concealing campaign expenditures and obstructing justice as part of an endorsement-for-pay scheme that roiled the Iowa Republican caucuses in 2012.

Kent Sorenson, of Milo, Iowa, admitted in federal district court that former Rep. Ron Paul’s presidential campaign secretly paid him $73,000 after he dramatically dropped his backing of Rep. Michele Bachmann in late 2011 and endorsed Paul’s White House bid, saying at the time that Bachmann was no longer a viable candidate.

A furious Bachmann charged then that Sorenson was being paid to flip his support to Paul -- an accusation that Sorenson, Paul and his campaign officials all denied.

But in court papers filed Wednesday, Sorenson acknowledged that he had been paid by both presidential campaigns.

An attorney for Sorenson, F. Montgomery Brown, said in a statement that his guilty plea was part of his process “of taking complete responsibility for the series of compounding errors and omissions he engaged in.”

“This is a very sad day for Mr. Sorenson, his family, and his friends, many of whom were in attendance in court,” Brown added. “To the extent others may take glee with his predicament, there is nothing that can be done.”

David A. Warrington, who served as general counsel to Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign, did not return requests for comment.

For most of 2011, the state senator received between $7,000 and $7,500 a month from Bachmann’s campaign and her PAC, according to court documents. Then in December 2011, after two months of secret negotiations with Paul’s campaign, he met with a Paul political operative at a restaurant in Altoona, Iowa, and agreed to change his allegiance. The operative gave the state senator’s wife a check for $25,000 to secure Sorenson’s support. (The check was apparently never cashed.)

The court filings did not identify the Paul operative, but in a recording of a phone call posted last year by TheIowaRepublican.com, Sorenson identified him as Dimitri Kesari, then Paul’s deputy national campaign manager. TheIowaRepublican.com and OpenSecrets.org, the Web site of the nonpartisan research group Center for Responsive Politics, also reported last year on emails in which representatives of Paul and Sorenson allegedly discussed his demands for payment.

Paul’s campaign chairman at the time was Jesse Benton, who is now running the re-election bid of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Benton did not respond to requests for comment. Jesse R. Binnall, an attorney representing Kesari, declined to comment.

After Sorenson publicly switched his endorsement, Paul’s campaign routed the state senator a total of $73,000 in 2012, transferring the payments through a film production company and another company to conceal the intended recipient, according to court filings. Sorenson wanted the payments kept secret because of Iowa Senate ethics rules that prohibit sitting senators from accepting payments from a political campaign, according to court papers.

Last year, when a state independent counsel was investigating allegations that Sorenson switched his endorsement for money, the state senator lied under oath that he had been paid by either campaign, the court filings said.

On Wednesday, 42-year-old Sorenson pleaded guilty to one count of causing a federal campaign committee to falsely report its expenditures and one count of obstruction of justice. He faces up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for the first count and up to 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000 for the second count, but prosecutors plan to recommend he receive a reduced sentence for accepting responsibility, according to court filings.

“Campaign finance reports should be accurate and transparent, not tools for concealing campaign expenditures,” Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division said in a statement. “Lying by public officials – whether intended to obstruct the FEC or federal investigators – violates the public trust and the law, and the Department of Justice does not tolerate it.”

Alice Crites contributed to this report.

Ian McColgin
08-29-2014, 07:15 AM
Of all the forms of campaign corruption, that seems to me about the least cost-effective and the most likely to be found out. For that reason, I suspect it's rare and reflects a level of free market stupidity that goes all the way through a candidacy.

Mike Erkkinen
08-29-2014, 07:40 AM
Doesn't exactly bolster confidence in our political process.

John Smith
08-29-2014, 08:26 AM
This guy was caught... but I wonder just how pervasive, the same thing is, in other campaigns.

Same people working for McConnell's campaign, so, for his sake, they best not be doing any of this there.

John Smith
08-29-2014, 08:31 AM
Doesn't exactly bolster confidence in our political process.

What confidence. Our system is quite screwed up even without criminal activity. States where primaries go early get to choose the candidate. I can't think of an election where the candidates weren't already picked before it got to my state. Then we have the super delegates, who, as I understand it, are suppose to step up after the people have voted and there's no clear winner. Last election they were endorsing people early on.

Then the media chooses someone they like and, intentionally or not, help that candidate.

Ads are full of lies, and that doesn't bother us. I'm not sure I see a difference between paying someone to say he supports you versus paying big dollars to run ads that tell people stuff that's not true.

S.V. Airlie
08-29-2014, 08:38 AM
Doesn't exactly bolster confidence in our political process.What took you so long to come to that conclusion? I've lost confidence in our political process ages ago.

Cuyahoga Chuck
08-29-2014, 01:00 PM
When you have a roster of unappetizing candidates the only way out is to let the money fly.