Unconstitutional Filibuster?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wardd
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 15162

    Unconstitutional Filibuster?

    "The Constitution prescribed six instances in which Congress would require more than a majority vote: impeaching the president, expelling members, overriding a presidential veto of a bill or order, ratifying treaties, and amending the Constitution," said Klein. And Bondurant's case is that in accepting these exceptions, the framers excluded all others -- like stifling the Senate's ability to make laws, and permitting presidential appointees to be sandbagged.
  • Tom Montgomery
    Lurking since 1997
    • Sep 1999
    • 35659

    #2
    Re: Unconstitutional Filibuster?

    Obviously the constitution has failed us. Time for a change.
    "They have a lot of stupid people that vote in their primaries. They really do. I'm not really supposed to say that but it's an obvious fact. But when stupid people vote, you know who they nominate? Other stupid people." -- James Carville on the plethora of low-quality GQP candidates in the mid-term election.

    Comment

    Working...