View Full Version : Rightists celebrate redistribution of wealth

Ian McColgin
12-04-2010, 02:44 PM
This report shows officials from the Bush 43 administration taking credit not only for forever tax cuts to the wealthy but for further discomfiting Democrats. I guess redistributing America’s wealth upwards calls for victory dance.

(I don't know how to C&P all the click-to-cites so those interested will need to go to the original or a good copy like in CommonDreams.)

Published on Friday, December 3, 2010 by Think Progress

Bush Officials Celebrate Tax Cut ‘Trap’ They Laid Nine Years Ago

by George Zornick

As debate rages in Washington over the Bush tax cuts, set to expire at the end of this year, the Bush administration officials who initiated the steep tax cuts are celebrating what they see as an apparent victory, since signs point to a temporary extension of all the cuts. The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz interviewed Dan Bartlett, Bush’s former communications director, and Andy Card, Bush’s former chief of staff, among others, and they were pleased at how the expiration debate has played out:

“We knew that, politically, once you get it into law, it becomes almost impossible to remove it,” says Dan Bartlett, Bush’s former communications director. “That’s not a bad legacy. The fact that we were able to lay the trap does feel pretty good, to tell you the truth.” [...]

“[Democrats] are definitely on the defensive,” Card says. “The fact that the 10-year clock ran out now had a big impact on the election.”

As Media Matters notes , former Bush senior adviser Karl Rove went on Fox News this week and further laid the proverbial trap, saying “without a hint of self-awareness” that “we’ve known this was going to be happening for a decade,” while lamenting the Democrats’ inaction.

When the tax cuts were enacted, with an expiration date, Republicans and Bush officials understood the political advantages of the “fiscal time bomb” they were setting. As Kurtz puts it: “At some point in the way distant future, Democrats could be accused of raising taxes if they tried to undo the Bush breaks and return to Clinton-era levels of taxation.” Democrats understood this, too: Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) told the Washington Post at the time that “[Bush is] going to be out of office when the roof falls in.”

There was a more sinister motive for sunsetting the tax cuts beyond politics, as well. It allowed the administration to pass the bill with a lower vote count in the Senate than would otherwise be necessary. Card freely admits to Kurtz that the administration wanted “the law to be permanent but couldn’t muster the votes to trump the Byrd Rule,” which would have required a 60-vote margin for a measure that significantly increases the federal deficit more than 10 years in the future. By setting the tax cuts to expire just short of ten years, the measure passed with 58 votes.

The various sunsets also hid the true cost of the bill. As Paul Krugman wrote at the time: “The administration, knowing that its tax cut wouldn’t fit into any responsible budget, pushed through a bill that contains the things it wanted most — big tax cuts for the very, very rich — and used whatever accounting gimmicks it could find to make the overall budget impact seem smaller than it is.”

Such deception and fiscal irresponsibility hardly seem cause for celebration. But because it appears that all of the tax cuts will once again be extended, resetting the fiscal time bomb in spite of public opposition , perhaps these Bush officials are justified in their mirth.

© 2010 Think Progress

12-04-2010, 03:05 PM
At some point it will come back and bite them in the arse. Law of the universe #865

Osborne Russell
12-04-2010, 03:14 PM
That they later admit what was formerly alleged, and more, is part of the strategy.

Hot Air
12-04-2010, 03:26 PM
What are you moaning about? Obama is a huge fan of redistribution.

12-04-2010, 03:30 PM
Amazing after holding the House Senate and Presidency the Democrats could not escape from GWs evil traps!

12-04-2010, 11:13 PM
While there might be no honor among thieves, there is evidently quite a lot of self-congratulation.

12-05-2010, 07:53 PM
^sehr droll.

Cuyahoga Chuck
12-05-2010, 08:15 PM
What are you moaning about? Obama is a huge fan of redistribution.

Our Founders where against an entrenched privileged class.
You knew that didn't you?

12-05-2010, 10:41 PM
Really? Did they put that in the Constitution somewhere and I just missed it?

There is a thing called "historical context" that can't be entirely captured in words. Reading something about our founding fathers might prove enlightening. They were, believe it or not, imperfect. In particular, check out John Hancock & smuggling convictions.

Cuyahoga Chuck
12-05-2010, 11:42 PM
Really? Did they put that in the Constitution somewhere and I just missed it?

You sure did, bubba. The constitution says our leader is a president who must be elected . And there ain't nothing in there about serving till death and passing his relm on to his heirs.

There will be a quizz on Friday. Make sure you bring a #2 pencil and a hanky so your nose don't dribble on the paper.

12-06-2010, 12:54 AM
You sure did, bubba. The constitution says our leader is a president who must be elected...

Cool, we do that every four years. So... no problems then, I'm not sure what your point was.