Nicholas Scheuer
04-24-2010, 09:59 AM
Pursuing the idea of the Bukh posted earlier, I'm thinking a ducted prop would be better than one entirely exposed, or shielded memrely by a skeg.
My Shearwater draws only 6-inches with her rudder fin and leeboards swung up, so the big 11" prop on our 9.9 Yamaha-HT is the deepest element, by far. I often get too careless in the shallows, which up in the North Channel tend to be Granite, and bang up the prop. Rather than live with vibration for the reainder of a weel-long cruise, I switch over to a spare prop (one fresh out of the rop repair shop). So I'm thinking that a duct for a fixed prop behind a Bukh would be a good idea for me.
My question is, how much better is a duck having a foil cross-section rather than merely having a straight-walled tube?
Moby Nick
My Shearwater draws only 6-inches with her rudder fin and leeboards swung up, so the big 11" prop on our 9.9 Yamaha-HT is the deepest element, by far. I often get too careless in the shallows, which up in the North Channel tend to be Granite, and bang up the prop. Rather than live with vibration for the reainder of a weel-long cruise, I switch over to a spare prop (one fresh out of the rop repair shop). So I'm thinking that a duct for a fixed prop behind a Bukh would be a good idea for me.
My question is, how much better is a duck having a foil cross-section rather than merely having a straight-walled tube?
Moby Nick